ROMAN CATHOLICISM IS A UNIVERSAL FANATICISM FABRICATING DOGMAS AND DOCTRINES TO COVER LIES, FORGERIES AND LEGENDS THEY MISTAKENLY LEGALISED DECADES AGO
THIS REVOLUTIONARY PROFESSOR OF MODERN THEOSOPHY IS
GETTING OLDER BY MIDNIGHT TODAY SO HAVE MY BIRTHDAY GIFT
Is
this a case of human beings being afraid to face the truth? Like in the
Bible, I have played the tunes and all of you refused to dance. Are you
afraid to upset the apple cart? Read these two last dissertations and see that
those living in arid lands have forced the whole world to pay pilgrimages to
lazy people who live on irreverent desert areas they hoodwinked everyone to
call "HOLY LANDS".
WHAT IS HOLY ABOUT TWO BROTHERS THAT ARE ALWAYS AT EACH OTHERS
THROATS WITH THE FUNDS THE ENTIRE NATIONS PROVIDE THEM TO PURCHASE ARMS AND
AMMUNITION TO KILL EACH OTHER AND THEN EXPECT THE UNITED NATIONS TO DISCUSS HOW
TO END THE PERENNIAL ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN WARS.
Shine your eyes. See the light of reason in these two last
mails I will ever send any of you! This is the hundredth email
lecture sent to my beloved ones, contacts of over 100 correspondents, yet all
of you are so complacent. Are you not concerned that the world is heading for
disaster? The world wars were all fought after Christianity dominated the
entire Europe . Were the soldiers not praying to the same God? When one
country lost to another one, was the god they prayed to a different one?
Islamic attempts at correcting the
religious bastardization has not made matters better, rather it has fuelled the
confusion and introduced violence and retributive justice. Despite these
abysmal failures to forge a ONE WORLD PEACE I have written all of you
individually and severally to salvage the GLOBAL VILLAGE we now live in by
HEALING THE WORLD OF RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY, XENOPHOBIA AND RACISM.
This is my last mail for this year
until I get responsible and constructive replies from at least ten citizens of
our new global village of cellular phones and the Internet that cause us
no violence. May the Almighty open your eyes to the destruction our
children face after we have gone the way of all flesh!
-------GOOD
BYE ------------------------------------------Dr J. K. Danmbaezue
ROMAN CATHOLICISM IS A UNIVERSAL FANATICISM
The Term “MOTHER OF GOD” is not only childish but the
most heretical and heinous phrase in all the prayers of the Adulterated Pauline
and Romanticised Catholic Church exported to all nations worldwide, for it is
not only blasphemous, idolatrous and sacrilegious BUT UTTERLY INFANTILE,
PUERILE, NON-SENSICAL and PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL!
A picture of Madonna was here
THE ONLY CORRECT PHRASEOLOGY
EVERYONE CAN EASILY ACCEPT IS; “THE MOTHER OF THE SON OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC AND JACOB” OR BRIEFLY, “THE EARTHLY MOTHER OF JESUS OF NAZARETH ”
Says:
The Revolutionary Professor of Theosophy; J. J. Kenez,
D.Sc.
The
Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Entire
Universe.
On Sunday 10/03/2013 @ 17:35 :39HRS GMT; the Eve of His 65th
Birthday
THE CURRENT ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH PRACTISED ALL
OVER THE WORLD IS ROMAN MITHRANISM DRESSED UP AS
PAULINE CHRISTIANITY!
JESUS WAS
DEIFIED BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE TO MARRY A CHRISTIAN GIRL HE FELL IN LOVE
WITH AND THUS ROMAN PAGANISM MIXED WITH MITHRANISM THE GREEK RELIGION THEY HAD
BEFORE THE ARRIVAL OF SAUL OF TARSUS PRODUCED THE ADULTERATED PAULINE VERSION
WITH ALL THE PERSONALITY ATTRIBUTES OF MITHRA, LITURGICAL CELEBRATIONS AND
FEASTS OF THE ‘SUN-GOD’ HOISTED ON JESUS OF NAZARETH, PATENTED IN ROME AS
‘GOD-THE-SON’ AND LATER EXPORTED TO THE WHOLE WORLD AS ROMAN CATHOLIC
MISSION! NEITHER PETER, THE HEAD OF THE APOSTLES; JAMES NOR JOHN HIS DEPUTIES
WAS INVOLVED IN THE NOTORIOUS COUNCIL OF NICAEA THAT RATIFIED
ITS FORMATION AND THEREFORE IT WAS A HERETICAL COUNTERFEIT THAT WAS
UNAUTHORISED, UNEDIFYING, PSYCHONEUROTICAL, ILLEGAL AND A COMPLETE FORGERY! IT
STILL IS TO DATE!!
Mithraism, one of the major
religions of the Roman Empire, the cult of Mithra, the ancient Persian god of
light and wisdom. In the Avesta, the sacred Zoroastrian writings (see Zoroastrianism)
of the ancient Persians, Mithra appears as the chief yazata (Avestan,
“beneficent one”), or good spirit, and ruler of the world. He was supposed to
have slain the divine bull, from whose dying body sprang all plants and animals
beneficial to humanity. After the conquest of Assyria in the 7th century bc and of Babylonia in the 6th century bc, Mithra became the god of the sun,
which was worshiped in his name (see Sun Worship). The Greeks of Asia Minor , by identifying Mithra with Helios,
the Greek god of the sun, helped to spread the cult. It was brought to Rome about 68 bc by Cilician pirates whom the Roman
general Pompey the Great had captured, and during the early empire it spread
rapidly throughout Italy and the Roman
provinces. It was a rival to Christianity in the Roman world.
Mithraism was similar
to Christianity in many respects, for example, in the ideals of humility and
brotherly love, baptism, the rite of communion, the use of holy water, the
adoration of the shepherds at Mithra's birth, the adoption of Sundays and of
December 25 (Mithra's birthday) as holy days, and the belief in the immortality
of the soul, the last judgment, and the resurrection. Mithraism differed from
Christianity in the exclusion of women from its ceremonies and in its
willingness to compromise with polytheism. The similarities, however, made
possible the easy conversion of its followers to Christian doctrine.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.
Historians are unsure exactly when Christians first began celebrating
the Nativity of Christ. However, most scholars believe that Christmas
originated in the 4th century as a Christian substitute for pagan celebrations
of the winter solstice. Before the introduction of Christmas, each year
beginning on December 17 Romans honoured Saturn, the ancient god of
agriculture, in a festival called Saturnalia. This festival lasted for seven
days and included the winter solstice, which usually occurred around December
25 on the ancient Julian calendar. During Saturnalia the Romans feasted,
postponed all business and warfare, exchanged gifts, and temporarily freed
their slaves. Many Romans also celebrated the lengthening of daylight following
the winter solstice by participating in rituals to glorify Mithra, the ancient
Persian god of light (see Mithraism). These and other winter festivities
continued through January 1, the festival of Kalends, when Romans marked the
day of the new moon and the first day of the month and year.
Although the Gospels
describe Jesus’ birth in detail, they never mention the date, so historians do
not know on what date he was born. The Roman Catholic Church chose December 25
as the day for the Feast of the Nativity in order to give Christian meaning to
existing pagan rituals. For example, the Church replaced festivities honouring
the birth of Mithra, the god of light, with festivities to commemorate the
birth of Jesus, whom the Bible calls the light of the world. The Catholic
Church hoped to draw pagans into its religion by allowing them to continue
their revelry while simultaneously honouring the birthday of Jesus. The Eastern
Orthodox Church took a slightly different course. By the end of the 4th century
the Eastern Church in Constantinople had also begun to acknowledge December 25 as Jesus’ birthday, but it
emphasized the celebration of Christ’s baptism on January 6 as the more
important holiday.
Over the next 1000
years, the observance of Christmas followed the expansion of Christianity into
the rest of Europe and into Egypt . Along the way, Christian beliefs combined with existing pagan feasts
and winter rituals to create many long-standing traditions of Christmas
celebrations. For example, ancient Europeans believed that the mistletoe plant
held magic powers to bestow life and fertility, to bring about peace, and to
protect against disease. Northern Europeans associated the plant with the Norse
goddess of love, Freya, and developed the custom of kissing underneath
mistletoe branches. Christians incorporated this custom into their Christmas celebrations
and kissing under a mistletoe branch eventually became a part of secular
Christmas tradition.
During the Reformation
of the 16th century, Protestants challenged the authority of the Catholic
Church, including its toleration of surviving pagan traditions during Christmas
festivities. For a brief time during the 17th century, Puritans banned
Christmas in England and in some English colonies in North America because they felt it
had become a season best known for gambling, flamboyant public behaviour, and
overindulgence in food and drink.
Europeans who settled
in North America often found they had to change their Christmas celebrations because
they could not faithfully recreate the traditions of their homelands. For
example, colonists in the American South may have aspired to recreate a sense of
the English Christmas. But colonial accounts of Christmas celebrations in the
South do not mention the presence of mummers (masked or costumed merrymakers)
or waits (musicians or carollers paid to perform at Christmastime), both of
which were central figures of the traditional English Christmas. Nor do
historical accounts describe settlers engaging in such traditional English
customs as feasting on boars’ heads or drinking from wassail bowls (bowls
filled with spiced ale or wine).
Colonists from England , France , Holland , Spain , and other countries also gradually modified their Christmas ceremonies
as they encountered new cultures and traditions in the New World . For example, in large towns, where
diverse groups lived close together, the common ground for celebration could
often be found in public and secular festivities rather than in potentially
divisive religious ceremonies. Thus, at least in New York City , the winter’s
holidays often culminated on New Year’s, not Christmas.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
CAN’T YOU SEE THAT ALL THE PERSONALITY TRAITS,
LITURGIES AND PAGAN CELEBRATIONS OF THE ‘MITHRA-SUN-GOD’ WERE HOISTED ON JESUS
OF NAZARETH AS ‘GOD-THE-SON’? EVEN THE BLIND CAN SEE IT!
Mary (Virgin
Mary),
the mother of Jesus Christ, venerated by Christians since apostolic times (1st century). The Gospels
give only a fragmentary account of Mary's life, mentioning her chiefly in
connection with the beginning and the end of Jesus' life. Matthew speaks of
Mary as Joseph's wife, who was “with child of the Holy Spirit” before they
“came together” as husband and wife (Matthew 1:18 ). After the birth of Jesus, she was
present at the visit of the Magi (Matthew 2:11 ), fled with Joseph to Egypt (Matthew 2:14 ), and returned to Nazareth (Matthew 2:23 ). Mark simply refers to Jesus as
the son of Mary (Mark 6:3). Luke's narrative of the nativity includes the angel
Gabriel's announcement to Mary foretelling the birth of Jesus (Luke 1:27-38);
her visit to her kinswoman Elizabeth, mother of John the Baptist, and Mary's
hymn, the Magnificat (Luke 1:39-56); and the shepherds' visit to the manger
(Luke 2:1-20). Luke also tells of Mary's perplexity at finding Jesus in the Temple questioning the teachers when he
was 12 years old. The Gospel of John contains no infancy narrative, nor does it
mention Mary's name; she is referred to as “the mother of Jesus” (John 2:1-5; 19:25 -27). According to John, she was
present at the first of Jesus' miracles at the wedding feast of Cana and at his death. Mary is also
mentioned as being present in the upper room at Olivet with the apostles and
with Jesus' brothers before Pentecost (Acts 1:14 ).
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE GOSPEL CREDITED TO APOSTLE JOHN OMITS NARRATIVES CONCERNING VIRGIN MARY COMPLETELY?
“The Gospel of John contains no infancy narrative, nor
does it mention Mary's name; she is referred to as “the mother of Jesus” (John
2:1-5; 19:25 -27).
According to John, she was present at the first of Jesus' miracles at the
wedding feast of Cana and at his
death.”
The principal theological
development concerning Mary in the Middle Ages was the doctrine of the
Immaculate Conception. This doctrine, defended and preached by the Franciscan
friars under the inspiration of the 13th-century Scottish theologian John Duns
Scotus, maintains that Mary was conceived without original sin. Dominican
teachers and preachers vigorously opposed the doctrine, maintaining that it
detracted from Christ's role as universal saviour. Pope Sixtus IV, a
Franciscan, defended it, establishing in 1477 a feast of the Immaculate Conception
with a proper mass and office to be celebrated on December 8. This feast was
extended to the whole Western church by Pope Clement XI in 1708. In 1854 Pope Pius IX issued a solemn
decree defining the Immaculate Conception for all Roman Catholics, but the
doctrine has not been accepted by Protestants or by the Orthodox churches. In
1950 Pope Pius XII solemnly defined as an article of faith for all Roman
Catholics the doctrine of the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
A LIAR NEEDS A HUNDRED LIES TO COVER UP THE VERY FIRST LIE!
MOST
FANATICS BREED DOCTRINES AND DOGMAS TO COVER DECEITS
Assumption
of the Virgin (Latin assumere, “to take up”) in the Roman Catholic church and
the Orthodox church, the doctrine that after her death the body of Mary, the
mother of Christ, was taken into heaven and reunited with her soul. Defined as
an article of faith by Pope Pius XII in 1950, the assumption was first
commemorated as the Feast of the Dormition (falling asleep) of Mary in the 6th
century. This feast later developed into the Feast of the Assumption, now
celebrated in the Roman Catholic church on August 15 every year.
In 1946 Pius named 32 new cardinals
to the Sacred College, including 5 from the U.S., bringing the college to 69
members (one short of the traditional complement of 70); for the first time it
was composed of representatives of all continents. Pius continued and
intensified the anti-Communist policies of his predecessor. In 1949 he issued a
historic proclamation declaring that any Roman Catholic rendering support of
any kind or degree to communism would automatically incur the penalty of
excommunication. Pius opened the 25th Holy Year in the history of the church on
December 24, 1949. The following November he issued the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus
Deus (Most Bountiful God), in which the assumption of the Blessed Virgin
Mary was defined as a dogma of faith (see Assumption of the Virgin). In
his Christmas message for 1950 Pius announced officially that the tomb of the
apostle Peter had been found during excavations under the high altar of Saint
Peter’s Basilica in Rome . On September
9, 1953 , he proclaimed the Marian Year in celebration of the centenary of the
definition of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary. Pius
XII died October 9, 1958 .
Current day Christians are satisfied
with repeating doctrines and dogmas they crammed as children when their brains
were BLANK SLATES and missionaries brainwashed their parents! Many christians
of today are half-baked, half-educated, half-civilised and half-christianised
or else tell me why they cannot ask relevant questions as illiterate villagers
did/do! An elder in my village asked the
white priest that came to evangelise my clan in the early 1940s; “IF GOD HAD A
SON THEN HE HAD A PENIS AND A WIFE. BUT YOU TOLD US THAT GOD IS A SPIRIT, DO
SPIRITS NOW HAVE WIVES?”
When will you ask your own questions?
When will you ask your own questions?
1. If Joseph was
not the father of Jesus, how then did Mary bear a normal baby instead of
“half-spirit half-human” baby that should be the correct result of the ‘in
vitro fertilisation’ that the fabricated story portrays?
2. How can a woman
bear a spirit that created the universe in her tiny human womb for nine months
and then deliver a baby boy that is fully human, that the confused Roman
Catholic Church insists on?
3. Can any medically
qualified neonatalogist or gynaecologist in his/her right senses ordinarily
accept such a scientific falsehood except for fear of excommunication or that
it labelled a dogma/doctrine?
JESUS NEVER ENTHRONED HIMSELF AS GOD
Only the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews captured the personality traits of Jesus conferred on him by the Almighty Father! In this opening chapter unlike every other book in the entire Bible, the narrative confirms my thesis that Jesus was/is the Son of God, elevated above every other created beings but never equal to the Supreme Being that created him and us! We do not show respect to the Father by equating him to his created, nor do we favour Jesus by setting him up against his Father.
Meditate on the bold phrases in this excerpt and really think them over. Can an ambassador be equal to the President of his home country? Can one who was granted special powers ever be equal to the One who gave him the powers in the first place? The answer is definitely; NO!
This passage states the statuses and special favours God, the Almighty Father of all of us bestowed on Jesus for a purpose! That is why he was able to stand all the temptations and triumph over the devil in every way even ‘death on the cross.’ My hope is that Christians should learn to worship only God the Father as Jesus enjoined us to and conscientiously respect him as the Son of God for accepting to die to save mankind!
Hebrews 1
1:1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.
3 The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.
4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.
5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, "I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him.”
7 In speaking of the angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire."
8 But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the sceptre of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy."
10 He also says, "In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment.
12 You will roll them up like a robe; like a garment they will be changed. But you remain the same, and your years will never end."
13 To which of the angels did God ever say, "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet"?
14 Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978 and 1984, by International Bible Society)
To get the hierarchical and accurate meaning of verse 7,
consider apostrophe-s at the word ‘servant’
7
In speaking of the
angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his servant’s flames of
fire."
I have said it on several occasions that anyone who is very serious with authentic religion; obedience to the natural laws of the Almighty Father, and tenacious about true worship of Him with works of charity, mercy and forgiveness can aspire to Sainthood, just as Jesus did to earn Christhood! Jesus was not born the ‘Son of God’ but was adopted by the Almighty Father of us all at his baptism. Tell me, was Jesus not a descendant from the family root of King David as prophesied in the OT? Even in the psalms credited to David, is the evidence not clear?
He received a special gift of anointing by the ‘Holy Spirit that came down in the form of a dove and rested on him’, as was reported by John, the Baptist, his maternal cousin, who was the only one that saw and heard “This is My Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased, hear you him”! It was after this John realised that Jesus had been chosen as the Messiah. The next day he pointed this out to his two disciples who then abandoned him and followed Jesus!
THE DOCTRINE OF ANGEL GABRIEL VISITING MARY WAS/IS A FORGERY AS IT WOULD REFUTE THAT JESUS WAS OF THE FAMILY ROOT OF JESSE, DAVID, WOULDN'T IT?
JESUS NEVER ENTHRONED HIMSELF AS GOD
Only the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews captured the personality traits of Jesus conferred on him by the Almighty Father! In this opening chapter unlike every other book in the entire Bible, the narrative confirms my thesis that Jesus was/is the Son of God, elevated above every other created beings but never equal to the Supreme Being that created him and us! We do not show respect to the Father by equating him to his created, nor do we favour Jesus by setting him up against his Father.
Meditate on the bold phrases in this excerpt and really think them over. Can an ambassador be equal to the President of his home country? Can one who was granted special powers ever be equal to the One who gave him the powers in the first place? The answer is definitely; NO!
This passage states the statuses and special favours God, the Almighty Father of all of us bestowed on Jesus for a purpose! That is why he was able to stand all the temptations and triumph over the devil in every way even ‘death on the cross.’ My hope is that Christians should learn to worship only God the Father as Jesus enjoined us to and conscientiously respect him as the Son of God for accepting to die to save mankind!
Hebrews 1
1:1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.
3 The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.
4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.
5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, "I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him.”
7 In speaking of the angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire."
8 But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the sceptre of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy."
10 He also says, "In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment.
12 You will roll them up like a robe; like a garment they will be changed. But you remain the same, and your years will never end."
13 To which of the angels did God ever say, "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet"?
14 Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978 and 1984, by International Bible Society)
To get the hierarchical and accurate meaning of verse 7,
consider apostrophe-s at the word ‘servant’
I have said it on several occasions that anyone who is very serious with authentic religion; obedience to the natural laws of the Almighty Father, and tenacious about true worship of Him with works of charity, mercy and forgiveness can aspire to Sainthood, just as Jesus did to earn Christhood! Jesus was not born the ‘Son of God’ but was adopted by the Almighty Father of us all at his baptism. Tell me, was Jesus not a descendant from the family root of King David as prophesied in the OT? Even in the psalms credited to David, is the evidence not clear?
He received a special gift of anointing by the ‘Holy Spirit that came down in the form of a dove and rested on him’, as was reported by John, the Baptist, his maternal cousin, who was the only one that saw and heard “This is My Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased, hear you him”! It was after this John realised that Jesus had been chosen as the Messiah. The next day he pointed this out to his two disciples who then abandoned him and followed Jesus!
THE DOCTRINE OF ANGEL GABRIEL VISITING MARY WAS/IS A FORGERY AS IT WOULD REFUTE THAT JESUS WAS OF THE FAMILY ROOT OF JESSE, DAVID, WOULDN'T IT?
VISIT THIS WEB ADDRESS FOR MORE:
Current day Christians are satisfied with repeating doctrines and dogmas they crammed as children when their brains were BLANK SLATES and missionaries brainwashed their parents! Many christians of today are half-baked, half-educated, half-civilised and half-christianised or else tell me why they cannot ask relevant questions as illiterate villagers did/do! An elder in my village asked the white priest that came to evangelise my clan in the early 1940s; “IF GOD HAD A SON THEN HE HAD A PENIS AND A WIFE. BUT YOU TOLD US THAT GOD IS A SPIRIT, DO SPIRITS NOW HAVE WIVES?” When will you ask your own questions?
ReplyDelete1. If Joseph was not the father of Jesus, how then did Mary bear a normal baby instead of “half-spirit half-human” baby that should be the correct result of the ‘in vitro fertilisation’ that the fabricated story portrays?
2. How can a woman bear a spirit that created the universe in her tiny human womb for nine months and then deliver a baby boy that is fully human, that the confused Roman Catholic Church insists on?
3. Can any medically qualified neonatalogist or gynaecologist in his/her right senses ordinarily accept such a scientific falsehood except for fear of excommunication or that it labelled a dogma/doctrine?
"There has been a retinue of charlatans in every profession in the world since the agricultural perspectives that Cain, the farmer and Abel, the shepherd introduced to the rest of humanity if the biblical legends and/or religious fables are worth their whiles! What is indigenous in a half-baked cleric who does not realise that he is only a pawn in the chessboard of Roman Sacredotal Nationals that have dominated the scene in Christendom since the Constantinian misadventure of bastardising the true ‘Good News of the Lord Jesus’ with the Mithranism era of Roman idolatry? For 500 years the baton of Papacy had always been handed over to only Roman citizens until lately, when Pope John Paul I was poisoned to death by fellow cardinals contesting for the throne of the Roman Catholic Papacy! Pope John Paul II surfaced as a belated consensus candidate. To date the reconciliatory position of the late Pope has not been accepted by hardcore Roman Theologians who see the throne as their birthright! When can other nations produce Popes as in past centuries? Was Jesus a native of Rome? Why has the Papacy continued to operate from Rome, whereas the birthplace of Jesus was/is Nazareth or Bethlehem? Why Muslims go to Mecca and Medina is obvious! When, therefore, shall Christians all over the world, especially Roman Catholics, become as reasonable as Muslims?"
ReplyDeleteCLERICAL CELIBACY HAS OUT-LIVED ITS USEFULNESS
ReplyDeleteThere was a time when Catholic Reverend Fathers and Reverend Sisters on missionary services in this country were really admired, respected and idolised! That was in my teens when the Late Bishop Shanahan was still an ordinary priest! Rev. Fr. Bindel was the Parish Priest of Ihiala, then a very large area extending as far away as Emekuku, Orlu and Oguta! They rode long distances on Hercules bicycles carrying out their evangelistic duties. They trekked most of the time and made converts by using the very few semi-literate natives as their interpreters!
These interpreters were later promoted to Catechists and soon wielded much power! They taught pagans catechism classes in the vernacular language and only those they certified as having passed their examinations were baptised. They stood between every catechumen and the sacraments of baptism, confession, confirmation, matrimony and even the irregular reception of the Holy Eucharist! You could neither see any Rev. Fr. nor receive any of these sacraments without greasing their palms! No girls or women ever came close to the parish houses, not to mention having handshakes with any priest!
The Rev. Sisters wore sparkling ankle-length white gowns and their head-gear with a tall hood and overflowing veils covered every part of their heads except for just the outline of their faces. I never saw their ears! To us little urchins at the turn of the century, they were angels. After all the pictures in our catechism classes were made of white skins. They were all white women. We never dreamt that we would, in later years, have our own black sisters and daughters qualified to become Rev. Sisters. No one ever imagined that a black skinned woman could ever be dressed like these white angels. These angels were our earliest teachers, nurses, midwives and doctors. They ran the few mission schools and hospitals that were then in existence at Ihiala and Emekuku. We adored and loved them for their motherly care but, at the same time, we hated their injection needles!
We were told that both the priests and nuns were virgins. It was even rumoured that they had no sexual parts to their bodies. They were ‘castrated’ was the naïve belief that made the rumour rounds then! We assumed that the nuns had neither breasts nor large buttocks like our mothers and aunts! How were we to find out? The priests were covered all over with their flowing white soutanes that they never put off in our presence. “Did they ever urinate or defecate?” we wondered! I never saw any of them in short knickers although I was a mass server for several years at St Martin’s Parish, Odo-ata Ihiala, now in Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra State. In addition, we never saw the ears, necks and feet of the nuns. During clinical attendance they wore gloves, so we were partially denied seeing their hands and fingers. “Did these ladies know how to cook?” we pondered!
ReplyDeleteThat the priests were chaste and the nuns, virgins, were assumed! We never saw the priests and nuns chat together, hug each other or stroll along any road side by side. They were discreet and circumspect. They were conscious of their vows of celibacy and public image knowing that they were continuously being watched day and night. So, they never scandalised us nor gave us the chance to suspect them! That was in the early 1930s and 1940s. We gradually began to notice that many nuns went on leaves that were termed “annual” and understood why some others that lasted beyond twelve months were termed “sudden”, “casual” or “sick.” Soon, our own sons and daughters were admitted into seminaries and convents. By the 1950s, some were ordained and professed respectively. This first set never scandalised us! We never suspected that they could lower the standards set by these missionary white angels! That was before the Nigeria-Biafra civil war that lasted from 1967 to 1970. The wind blew strongly so the hen’s anus was clearly seen by all!
All that changed as the scales fell off our eyes. Our religious blinkers were forcibly removed by what we saw during the civil war at the few Caritas Feeding Centres that we naturally located within the parish premises. We saw a lot. Some printable, others not whisper-able! Promiscuity was the mildest term for describing what the refugee women described as own contributions to the war effort! Our clergymen and women were the butt of their sexual exploits as relief items like stockfish, egg-yolk and milk were exchanged for amorous relationships. Some wore the glamorous foreign dresses donated by CARITAS & WCC that were meant for homeless refugees that left their wardrobes behind!
“Have they also eaten the forbidden fruit” was the mildest joke about what we knew was happening at our local parishes. There was a conspiracy of silence by all the culprits!
“If clerical celibacy has out-lived its usefulness, what is the need of clinging tenaciously to it? This is an absurdity on the part of the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy”. In medical language, it is giving a wrong diagnosis while a sick patient is in a comatose state! Alternatively, shall we take it that the Church Fathers support the numerous sex scandals rocking the boat? Or, has it become so insensitive to the evidence of cases of paedophilia in USA, of lesbian and homosexual relationships reported in the mass media and so many incidences of promiscuity in other parts of the globe and that warrants our “separated brethren” laughing us to scorn? Why has the Pope and the Cardinals turned their eyes the other way? Are they neck deep in these scandals themselves? Probably it is a case of those living in glass houses not throwing stones at each other? They are blind pastors leading the faithful!
ReplyDeleteOur Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, had prophesied about them when he compared them to the religious leaders of his time. He reiterated that they were hypocrites that devoured the homes of widows. He labelled them, “white sepulchres, which on the outside looked clean but were rotten and decaying on the inside.” Anyone who deceptively takes a vow of celibacy and deliberately violates it regularly without any pricks of the conscience is a demon and definitely a disciple of Satan! That is why we refer to them as ‘Postgraduates of Satan’s University.’ They are candidates for hellfire and they will lead as many of us as they can to the same place. They are only working for their master, Lucifer! Listen to what Jesus Christ said about such hypocrites who take false vows in the New Testament account of Matthew’s Gospel, Chapter 23, vv. 25 - 28:
“How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You clean the outside of your cup and plate, while the inside is full of what you have obtained by violence and selfishness. Blind Pharisee! Clean what is inside the cup first, and then the outside will be clean too! “How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look fine on the outside but are full of bones and decaying corpses on the inside. In the same way, on the outside you appear good to everybody, but on the inside, you are full of hypocrisy and sins.”
My dear false clerics; does anyone need an interpretation for those simple statements of facts? What does a tomb covered with tiles look like theses days? Sparkling White! Suppose you dig up the contents after three months of burying a human corpse in it, what will you find inside? Dry bones, the skull nails, hairs, the teeth and may be some decaying flesh!
CONCLUSION OF THE MATTER
ReplyDeleteThere are many clerics and nuns, otherwise referred to as Rev. Fathers and Rev. Sisters, including those that have been elevated to Monsignors, Mother Generals, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals in the Roman Catholic hierarchy that should surmon courage and leave gracefully before the youths of our Golbal Village forcibly remove them fro their pecuniary, parasitic, sycophanic and adulterous lifestyles. There are no jobs in the labour market worldwide and so those who successfully pretended to have had vocations all through their training periods till they are ordained and then they continue to live false lives with impunity!
No one spits out sugar when it has already entered the mouth! Free housing, free cars, free televisions, free dresses, free toiletries as well as free food, free sex e.t.c. These crafty tortoises in our native stories! They think they are smart! WHY?
THEY ARE ALL AFRAID OF LOSING THEIR FREE BREAD AND BUTTER!
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue a.k.a. Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez
This ex-seminarian capped ‘Rt. Rev. Bishop Echipu’ at the Diamond Jubillee of All Hallows Seminary, Onitsha is begging clerics to resign honourably than staying put and scandalising the youths in our parishes and other youth fellowships worldwide!
SUMMATION OF THE MISSION STATEMENT OF I S M
ReplyDeleteKENEZIANISM or ISM is founded on the discovery of all the natural and eternal laws in creation and full obedience to all of them.
Dr Kenez argues that since there is only:
• One created universe, of which we all share its amenities,
• One earth, on which we all stand, walk about, build our physical structures, plant on, harvest from and solely depend on for our food,
• One atmospheric air that all living things breathe from to live,
• One rainfall that provides the water for all plants and animals,
• One sun and a moon that illuminate the world day and night,
• One anatomy and physiology that ensures our survival or death,
• Therefore, there must One Almighty Creator, who is the Ultimate Designer and Engineer responsible all that we can think, say, hear, feel and see! He/She/It is our Father/Mother/Creator that deserves our gratitude, obedience and loyalty.
In brief, Kenezians worship this Absolute Truth wherever it is found; on, below or above the earth! Tell, Live, Propagate and Die for the Truth! This principle and only this lifestyle guide the true sons and daughters of the Almighty Creator of the universe who we designate as crusaders for world peace for our global village!
Dr. Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue a.k.a.
Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc.
The Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Universe
VISIT THIS SITE FOR A SAMPLE OF TRUTH UNLIMITED
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1NTz6BRohQ7IdkJnybHD3M7vZE9aVr68DIwgjojmbYJbV-Ld7Enq94SFATQ9Q/edit?usp=sharing
LECTURES TO POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS ON PSYCHOMETRICS IN FAMILY COUNSELLING
https://picasaweb.google.com/100752842609304318747/SOMEKENEZIANCLIPSFROMTHEOMNIVOROUSLECTURESERIESONFAMILYCOUNSELLINGCARRIEDOUTINNIGERIA