ANOTHER RELIGIOUS FANATIC MICHAEL
SHERLOCK WRITES
Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu correspondences with Michael Sherlock
JESUS WAS THE SON OF JOSEPH
John, the Baptist, stated in unambiguous sentence. He was the only one who saw the Spirit descend as a dove and also heard “THIS IS MY BELOVED SON……..
John said in “34 And I have seen and have borne witness that this is the Son of God." (RSV)
“I knew him not”, John did not know that God had chosen him to be the Christ; however, he should be manifested in some way through his baptism. I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove. See Mt 3:16, and notes. It was revealed to John that the Christ would thus be revealed. Indeed it was the anointing of the Spirit that made Jesus the Anointed, the Christ.”
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue a.k.a. Revl. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc.
The Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Universe.
(ORIGINAL KJV with translations in RSV and commentaries from PNTC)
19 And <kai> this <houtos> is <esti> the record <marturia> of John <Ioannes>, when <hote> the Jews <Ioudaios> sent <apostello> priests <hiereus> and <kai> Levites <Leuites> from <ek> Jerusalem <Hierosoluma> to <hina> ask <erotao> him <autos>, Who <tis> art <ei> thou <su>? (KJV)
19 And this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN MHC MHCC PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
This is the record of John. The writer now plunges at once into his history. He passes by the childhood of the Lord, John's ministry, and comes at once to the time when Jesus, thirty years old, is acknowledged by the Father as the Son of God.
When the Jews sent priests and Levites. The Jewish rulers, the Sanhedrin, the court or parliament of seventy-one members who ruled
20 And <kai> he confessed <homologeo>, and <kai> denied <arneomai> not <ou>; but <kai> confessed <homologeo>, <hoti> I <ego> am <eimi> not <ou> the Christ <Christos>. (KJV)
20 He confessed, he did not deny, but confessed, "I am not the Christ." (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN PNTC RWP TFG
People's New Testament Commentary:
Some conjectured that John was the expected Christ; others that he was Elijah who was first to come (Mal 4:5); others that he was "that prophet," the one predicted by Moses (De 18:15); but he declared that he was none of these. When they insisted that he should declare who he was, he quoted Isaiah, and said he was "The voice of one crying in the wilderness [see Isa 40:3]. See PNTC for Mt 3:3. His work was preparation for the Lord.
21 And <kai> they asked <erotao> him <autos>, What <tis> then <oun>? Art <ei> thou <su> Elias <Helias>? And <kai> he saith <lego>, I am <eimi> not <ou>. Art <ei> thou <su> that prophet <prophetes>? And <kai> he answered <apokrinomai>, No <ou>. {that prophet: or, a prophet?} (KJV)
21 And they asked him, "What then? Are you Elijah?" He said, "I am not." "Are you the prophet?" And he answered, "No." (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN RWP
22 Then <oun> said they <epo> unto him <autos>, Who <tis> art thou <ei>? that <hina> we may give <didomi> an answer <apokrisis> to them that sent <pempo> us <hemas>. What <tis> sayest thou <lego> of <peri> thyself <seautou>? (KJV)
22 They said to him then, "Who are you? Let us have an answer for those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?" (RSV)
ACC Barnes RWP TFG
23 He said <phemi>, I <ego> am the voice <phone> of one crying <boao> in <en> the wilderness <eremos>, Make straight <euthuno> the way <hodos> of the Lord <kurios>, as <kathos> said <epo> the prophet <prophetes> Esaias <Hesaias>. (KJV)
23 He said, "I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, 'Make straight the way of the Lord,' as the prophet Isaiah said." (RSV)
ACC Barnes FBN JWN RWP
24 And <kai> they which <ho> were sent <apostello> were <en> of <ek> the Pharisees <Pharisaios>. (KJV)
24 Now they had been sent from the Pharisees. (RSV)
GBN Barnes JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Were of the Pharisees. See PNTC for Mt 3:7.
25 And <kai> they asked <erotao> him <autos>, and <kai> said <epo> unto him <autos>, Why <tis> baptizest thou <baptizo> then <oun>, if <ei> thou <su> be <ei> not <ou> that Christ <Christos>, nor <oute> Elias <Helias>, neither <oute> that prophet <prophetes>? (KJV)
25 They asked him, "Then why are you baptizing, if you are neither the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the prophet?" (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN PNTC RWP TFG
People's New Testament Commentary:
Why baptizest thou then? If he were Christ, or Elias, or "that prophet," they could understand why he should establish a new religious rite, but if none of these, why should he do so? Their perplexity shows that the baptismal rite was new to them. There is no proof that Jewish proselyte baptism of Gentile converts existed at this period, save the assertion of the Talmud, written two or three centuries after this. Josephus, who wrote in the time of the apostles, is silent about it.
26 John <Ioannes> answered <apokrinomai> them <autos>, saying <lego>, I <ego> baptize <baptizo> with <en> water <hudor>: but <de> there standeth one <histemi> among <mesos> you <humon>, whom <hos> ye <humeis> know <eido> not <ou>; (KJV)
26 John answered them, "I baptize with water; but among you stands one whom you do not know, (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB
People's New Testament Commentary:
I baptize with water. See PNTC for Mt 3:11.
27 He <autos> it is <esti>, who <hos> coming <erchomai> after <opiso> me <mou> is preferred <ginomai> before <emprosthen> me <mou>, whose <hos> <autos> shoe's <hupodema> latchet <himas> I <ego> am <eimi> not <ou> worthy <axios> to <hina> unloose <luo>. (KJV)
27 even he who comes after me, the thong of whose sandal I am not worthy to untie." (RSV)
ACC Barnes RWP
28 These things <tauta> were done <ginomai> in <en> Bethabara <Bethabara> beyond <peran> Jordan <Iordanes>, where <hopou> John <Ioannes> was <en> baptizing <baptizo>. (KJV)
28 This took place in
ACC Barnes FBN JFB
People's New Testament Commentary:
These things were done in Bethabara. The Revised Version says in Bethany, a village whose site is now unknown, on the east bank of the
29 The next day <epaurion> John <Ioannes> seeth <blepo> Jesus <Iesous> coming <erchomai> unto <pros> him <autos>, and <kai> saith <lego>, Behold <ide> the Lamb <amnos> of God <theos>, which <ho> taketh away <airo> the sin <hamartia> of the world <kosmos>. {taketh away: or, beareth} (KJV)
29 The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN MHC MHCC PNTC RWP TFG TSK WBN
People's New Testament Commentary:
The next day John seeth Jesus. Here Jesus first appears, in person, in John's account, who omits all the details given by Matthew and Luke of his earlier life. He was now thirty years old, and came from
Behold the Lamb of God. Innocent like the lamb, to be offered as a lamb, "led as a lamb to the slaughter" (Isa 53:7). The lamb was commonly used as a sin offering (Le
The sin of the world. Not of Jews only, but of Gentiles. John points to Jesus as the world's Savior.
30 This <houtos> is he <esti> of <peri> whom <hos> I <ego> said <epo>, After <opiso> me <mou> cometh <erchomai> a man <aner> which <hos> is preferred <ginomai> before <emprosthen> me <mou>: for <hoti> he was <en> before <protos> me <mou>. (KJV)
30 This is he of whom I said, 'After me comes a man who ranks before me, for he was before me.' (RSV)
Barnes PNTC RWP TFG
People's New Testament Commentary:
This is he of whom I said. See Joh 1:27.
Was before. Existed before I was born.
31 And I <kago> knew <eido> him <autos> not <ou>: but <alla> that <hina> he should be made manifest <phaneroo> to
31 I myself did not know him; but for this I came baptizing with water, that he might be revealed to
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
I knew him not. Knew not that God had chosen him to be the Christ. He knew, however, that he should be manifested in some way through his baptism.
32 And <kai> John <Ioannes> bare record <martureo>, saying <lego>, <hoti> I saw <theaomai> the Spirit <pneuma> descending <katabaino> from <ek> heaven <ouranos> like <hosei> a dove <peristera>, and <kai> it abode <meno> upon <epi> him <autos>. (KJV)
32 And John bore witness, "I saw the Spirit descend as a dove from heaven, and it remained on him. (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes PNTC RWP TFG TSK
People's New Testament Commentary:
I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove. See Mt 3:16, and notes. It was revealed to John that the Christ would thus be revealed. Indeed it was the anointing of the Spirit that made Jesus the Anointed, the Christ.
33 And I <kago> knew <eido> him <autos> not <ou>: but <alla> he that sent <pempo> me <me> to baptize <baptizo> with <en> water <hudor>, the same <ekeinos> said <epo> unto me <moi>, Upon <epi> whom <hos> <an> thou shalt see <eido> the Spirit <pneuma> descending <katabaino>, and <kai> remaining <meno> on <epi> him <autos>, the same <houtos> is <esti> he which baptizeth <baptizo> with <en> the Holy <hagios> Ghost <pneuma>. (KJV)
33 I myself did not know him; but he who sent me to baptize with water said to me, 'He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.' (RSV)
ACC Barnes FBN RWP
34 And I <kago> saw <horao>, and <kai> bare record <martureo> that <hoti> this <houtos> is <esti> the Son <huios> of God <theos>. (KJV)
34 And I have seen and have borne witness that this is the Son of God." (RSV)
GBN Barnes FBN JWN RWP TFG
35 Again <palin> the next day after <epaurion> John <Ioannes> stood <histemi>, and <kai> two <duo> of <ek> his <autos> disciples <mathetes>; (KJV)
35 The next day again John was standing with two of his disciples; (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB PNTC RWP TFG TSK WBN
People's New Testament Commentary:
Again the next day after, John stood, and two of his disciples. In Joh 1:19-28, the account is given of the visit of the priests and Levites, sent by the Sanhedrin to John. "The next day" after this, John sees Jesus and points him out as the Lamb of God, giving a discourse of which, in Joh 1:19-34, we have a synopsis. On the "next day" after this, the third day after the deputation of the Sanhedrin, and the second after the return of Jesus from the wilderness, John stood with two of his disciples. One of these two, we learn from Joh
36 And <kai> looking upon <emblepo> Jesus <Iesous> as he walked <peripateo>, he saith <lego>, Behold <ide> the Lamb <amnos> of God <theos>! (KJV)
36 and he looked at Jesus as he walked, and said, "Behold, the Lamb of God!" (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB PNTC RWP TFG TSK
People's New Testament Commentary:
Behold the Lamb of God! On the preceding day John had recognized Jesus in a public discourse as "the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world" [Joh
37 And <kai> the two <duo> disciples <mathetes> heard <akouo> him <autos> speak <laleo>, and <kai> they followed <akoloutheo> Jesus <Iesous>. (KJV)
37 The two disciples heard him say this, and they followed Jesus. (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN MHC MHCC RWP
38 Then <de> Jesus <Iesous> turned <strepho>, and <kai> saw <theaomai> them <autos> following <akoloutheo>, and saith <lego> unto them <autos>, What <tis> seek ye <zeteo>? <de> They said <epo> unto him <autos>, Rabbi <rhabbi>, (which <hos> is to say <lego>, being interpreted <hermeneuo>, Master <didaskalos>,) where <pou> dwellest thou <meno>? {dwellest: or, abidest} (KJV)
38 Jesus turned, and saw them following, and said to them, "What do you seek?" And they said to him, "Rabbi" (which means Teacher), "where are you staying?" (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB PNTC RWP TFG TSK
People's New Testament Commentary:
Rabbi. A term meaning "teacher," or "master."
Where dwellest thou? These disciples had followed at the bidding of John. Their question implies a desire to be in the company of Jesus.
39 He saith <lego> unto them <autos>, Come <erchomai> and <kai> see <eido>. They came <erchomai> and <kai> saw <eido> where <pou> he dwelt <meno>, and <kai> abode <meno> with <para> him <autos> that <ekeinos> day <hemera>: for <de> it was <en> about <hos> the tenth <dekatos> hour <hora>. {about...: that was two hours before night} (KJV)
39 He said to them, "Come and see." They came and saw where he was staying; and they stayed with him that day, for it was about the tenth hour. (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB PNTC RWP TFG
People's New Testament Commentary:
It was about the tenth hour. Counting from
40 One <heis> of <ek> the two <duo> which <ho> heard <akouo> <para> John <Ioannes> speak, and <kai> followed <akoloutheo> him <autos>, was <en> Andrew <Andreas>, Simon <Simon> Peter's <Petros> brother <adelphos>. (KJV)
40 One of the two who heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. (RSV)
Barnes JFB PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
One of the two . . . was Andrew. Afterwards an apostle. He has the honor of being one of the first two disciples of Jesus.
41 He <houtos> first <protos> findeth <heurisko> his own <idios> brother <adelphos> Simon <Simon>, and <kai> saith <lego> unto him <autos>, We have found <heurisko> the Messias <Messias>, which <hos> is <esti>, being interpreted <methermeneuo>, the Christ <Christos>. {the Christ: or, the Anointed} (KJV)
41 He first found his brother Simon, and said to him, "We have found the Messiah" (which means Christ). (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Findeth his own brother Simon. Simon Peter. In true missionary spirit Andrew at once and first sought his own brother.
We have found the Messias. The Christ promised by the prophets. Messiah is the Hebrew word meaning the same as Christ, [that is, "Anointed One."]
42 And <kai> he brought <ago> him <autos> to <pros> Jesus <Iesous>. And <de> when Jesus <Iesous> beheld <emblepo> him <autos>, he said <epo>, Thou <su> art <ei> Simon <Simon> the son <huios> of Jona <Ionas>: thou <su> shalt be called <kaleo> Cephas <Kephas>, which <hos> is by interpretation <hermeneuo>, A stone <Petros>. (KJV)
42 He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him, and said, "So you are Simon the son of John? You shall be called Cephas" (which means Peter). (RSV)
ACC Barnes FBN JFB
People's New Testament Commentary:
Thou shalt be called Cephas. A Hebrew word meaning "stone." Peter is the Greek form.
43 The day following <epaurion> Jesus <Iesous> would <thelo> go forth <exerchomai> into <eis>
43 The next day Jesus decided to go to
ACC Barnes JFB MHC MHCC PNTC RWP TFG
People's New Testament Commentary:
Findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. This is the first recorded instance of the Savior calling a disciple to follow him. Philip, it must be borne in mind, is not Philip, "one of the seven" [Ac 21:8], but "one of the Twelve," a citizen of Bethsaida of Galilee [Joh
44 Now <de> Philip <Philippos> was <en> of <apo>
44 Now Philip was from
Barnes FBN JFB RWP
45 Philip <Philippos> findeth <heurisko> Nathanael <Nathanael>, and <kai> saith <lego> unto him <autos>, We have found <heurisko> him, of whom <hos> Moses <Moseus> in <en> the law <nomos>, and <kai> the prophets <prophetes>, did write <grapho>, Jesus <Iesous> of <apo> Nazareth <Nazareth>, the son <huios> of Joseph <Ioseph>. (KJV)
45 Philip found Nathanael, and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Philip findeth Nathanael. As we learn from Joh 21:2, Nathanael was a Galilean, his home being at "
We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write. There was only one to whom this could refer, "The prophet like unto Moses" (De 34:10; Ac 3:22; 7:37), the Messiah; and when Philip names Jesus of Nazareth, Nathanael is at once skeptical whether the Messiah could come out of Nazareth, an insignificant and despised place.
46 And <kai> Nathanael <Nathanael> said <epo> unto him <autos>, Can <dunamai> there any <tis> good thing <agathos> come <einai> out of <ek>
46 Nathanael said to him, "Can anything good come out of
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Come and see. That is the best answer to the skeptic. Bring him to Christ, let him consider him, and what he has done for mankind. The strongest proof that Jesus is the Christ is Jesus himself.
47 Jesus <Iesous> saw <eido> Nathanael <Nathanael> coming <erchomai> to <pros> him <autos>, and <kai> saith <lego> of <peri> him <autos>, Behold <ide> an Israelite <Israelites> indeed <alethos>, in <en> whom <hos> is <esti> no <ou> guile <dolos>! (KJV)
47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and said of him, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB RWP TFG
48 Nathanael <Nathanael> saith <lego> unto him <autos>, Whence <pothen> knowest thou <ginosko> me <me>? Jesus <Iesous> answered <apokrinomai> and <kai> said <epo> unto him <autos>, Before <pro> that Philip <Philippos> called <phoneo> thee <se>, when thou wast <on> under <hupo> the fig tree <suke>, I saw <eido> thee <se>. (KJV)
48 Nathanael said to him, "How do you know me?" Jesus answered him, "Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you." (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Whence knowest thou me? Nathanael, who had never met Jesus before, was surprised to hear himself spoken of as one known.
When thou wast under the fig tree. There was something about this answer that filled Nathanael with astonishment. Under the shade and shelter of the fig tree he had some rare experience that is not recorded, and that he supposed unknown to man. That Jesus knew of it and read his soul startled him and dissipated his unbelief.
49 Nathanael <Nathanael> answered <apokrinomai> and <kai> saith <lego> unto him <autos>, Rabbi <rhabbi>, thou <su> art <ei> the Son <huios> of God <theos>; thou <su> art <ei> the King <basileus> of
49 Nathanael answered him, "Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!" (RSV)
ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Thou art the Son of God; the King of Israel. Philip had said, "Jesus, the son of Joseph" [Joh
50 Jesus <Iesous> answered <apokrinomai> and <kai> said <epo> unto him <autos>, Because <hoti> I said <epo> unto thee <soi>, I saw <eido> thee <se> under <hupokato> the fig tree <suke>, believest thou <pisteuo>? thou shalt see <optanomai> greater things <meizon> than these <touton>. (KJV)
50 Jesus answered him, "Because I said to you, I saw you under the fig tree, do you believe? You shall see greater things than these." (RSV)
ACC Barnes FBN JFB RWP
51 And <kai> he saith <lego> unto him <autos>, Verily <amen>, verily <amen>, I say <lego> unto you <humin>, Hereafter <arti> <apo> ye shall see <optanomai> heaven <ouranos> open <anoigo>, and <kai> the angels <aggelos> of God <theos> ascending <anabaino> and <kai> descending <katabaino> upon <epi> the Son <huios> of man <anthropos>. (KJV)
51 And he said to him, "Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man." (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN PNTC RWP
People's New Testament Commentary:
Ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending. Jacob, old
(Ge 28:12). Christ is that ladder, the way from earth to heaven, the way heaven sends messages to the world and the way we must go to reach it. Nathanael would be permitted to see that Jesus was the Mediator, that through him the Father speaks to man; that through him there is intercommunication between earth and heaven.
A KENEZIAN COM
This Humble Vessel warns humanity thus, Titles have destroyed kingdoms before and after the arrival and departure of Jesus, the Christ; who warned thus: “What comes out of a man defiles him more than what goes into him.”
Religious symbols have been borrowed across cultures and religious boundaries for centuries that they rarely mean same things to a variety of fanatical followers or worshippers of the plethora of religions and denominations in our present world. How do we penetrate centuries of historical distortions of the originals to define the pristine truths from nature and established by our Creator so that we can arrive at the most objective version that is egalitarian, humane and applicable in all cultures, time and clime for world peace? The Universal Idolatry introduced by a pagan emperor of
Quotations that amplify INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT
Before the advent of colonial administration, the largest political unit in
--Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc. (2001) the Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Creator of the Universe.
Religious symbols have been borrowed across cultures and religious boundaries for centuries that they rarely mean same things to a variety of fanatical followers or worshippers of the plethora of religions and denominations in our present world. How do we penetrate centuries of historical distortions of the originals to define the pristine truths from nature and established by our Creator so that we can arrive at the most objective version that is egalitarian, humane and applicable in all cultures, time and clime for world peace? Or, put in another fashion, how can we be certain that the doctrines and dogmas we hold on to today were/are not merely fake theories from the past. In short, how do we sift truth from human beliefs, myths, legends and/or fables forged and fabricated by sages of old or demagogues whose objectives were merely manipulating the masses of their generation into reverencing and/or obeying them sheepishly? This is the task before all of us. It is the only way to arrive at ONE WORLD RELIGION.
--Dr J. K. Danmbaezue, PG Student (1981) after the Rev Jones/Guyana Mass Religious Suicide.
The Igbo people have no name for the Giver of Life! All we have are appellations that describe the evident and superlative traits of this Consummate Spirit that created, creates and will still continue to create and sustain all the beings; visible and invisible, animate and inanimate, human or inhuman for ages in the future;
1. Chi-na-eke: the ultimate spirit that creates
2. Chi-ukwu: the greatest spirit
3. Obasi bi n-elu: the omnipotent that lives on high
4. Ama-di-oha: the supreme husband of all
5. Ogara-nya ngada-nga: the wealthiest of the rich
6. Ugwu ana-ari-atu egwu: the highest mountain that is climbed with trepidation
7. Ogbajiri igwe kpoo ya nku: He that breaks steel and calls it dry wood
8. Utu na agba igwe: bacteria that eats up iron, i.e. potent ant that tears iron to shreds
9. Ogbu onye mbosi ndu n’ato ya oto: he that snuffs life out the arrogant at the apex of egocentric pride.
In our culture, one can only give a name to what one owns, has authority over and can dispose of at will! It is not right to give any name to the Creator; we describe what he is and does; “Chi-na-eke”, meaning; “the divine spirit that creates” or “Chi-Ukwu”; the Ultimate Spirit! Those who use the label “God or gods” for the Creator; have never spelt it backwards. Try it now and be shocked at what you get. The Igbo could not, should not and cannot use a pejorative term or even an honourable one for their Creator!
---------Preface to RENASCENT IGBO RELIGION by Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, Animator of I S M
Is it not cynical that each nation had prayers said for its soldiers before each battle? Were they praying to the same God? Religion is politics, but many uninformed adherents are hoodwinked into believing that “God” is their President General. He was/is the supreme dictator and priests and imams were only human administrators. In the current craze for wealth engaged in by fake pastors, evangelists and overseer, exploitation in religion wears different gowns; annual missionary collections, church/mosque levies, pilgrimages, compulsory offertory collections, harvest and bazaars. To date, centuries after some colonised nations have won pseudo-political independence; none is independent of religious domination by their religio-political masters. The wonder of it all it that the above-underlined scenario is what has been happening and will continue to happen in churches/mosques all over Africa “world without end! Amen!” The congregation is short-changed by their wry religious leaders who wine, dine and womanise while they go a-borrowing to take care of their children’s health, education and other familial duties unaided by any one!
“Freedom of Religion is the right of a person to form personal religious beliefs according to his or her own conscience and to give public expression to these beliefs in worship and teaching, restricted only by the requirements of public order. Religious liberty differs from toleration in that toleration presupposes preferential treatment of a particular creed by the state because it is an established church or, in some cases, is the predominant religion of the population. To achieve worldwide religious freedom may seem impossible or sound like a mirage, but not to this astute thinker, this writer who has been under its theocratic enslavement for half-a-century. His answer is worth experimenting with.
Have you read THE KENEZIAN CREE D,
DR KENEZ LETTER TO EDUC ATIONISTS,
THE KENEZIAN EPITAPH and THE ANIMATOR’S INTERNATI ONAL
PRAYER? After you have meditated on their contents, the formula for how ONE
WORLD RELIGION can materialise is crystal clear to all rational human beings.
We must first of take stock of the numerical strength of the plethora of
factions in the major world religions for now and evaluate how counter-productive
the multiplicity of religious organisations has demoralised and scandalised the
youth. A worldwide religious census is imperative!”
---Rev. Prof. J.J.Kenez, the Humble vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Universe.
Based on what historians have written on the emergence of religions, this author has observed that there is no semblance of religious freedom or independence in most communities and organisations all over the world. When one has to subscribe to the tenets a foreign religion, behave according to the doctrines and dogmas manufactured, labelled and patented outside one’s psycho-socio-cultural milieu, is such a person really independent? I know that there is only True God, the Almighty Creator of the entire universe, the greatest Designer, Architect and Engineer who embedded universal laws for the every being he has created.
---Rev. Prof. J.J.Kenez, the Humble vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Universe.
Based on what historians have written on the emergence of religions, this author has observed that there is no semblance of religious freedom or independence in most communities and organisations all over the world. When one has to subscribe to the tenets a foreign religion, behave according to the doctrines and dogmas manufactured, labelled and patented outside one’s psycho-socio-cultural milieu, is such a person really independent? I know that there is only True God, the Almighty Creator of the entire universe, the greatest Designer, Architect and Engineer who embedded universal laws for the every being he has created.
True worship of this Ultimate Reality is Obedience to all
his Natural and Eternal Laws irrespective of place, time and clime surrounding
each person’s birth, parentage and social status. Therefore, the only religion
that we are born into is true adoration, thanksgiving, mutual respect and
brother/sisterhood to all peoples. We must worship Him in the Spirit of Truth
and Fraternal Love which his Holy Spirit dictates and infuses in our individual
hearts.
Oh! that peace will reign among all the creatures of the
Almighty Creator, I pray!
INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT is a universal spiritual fellowship for all natural scientists and rational human being who can decipher the truth despite centuries of deceit, subterfuge and indoctrinations. Equating Jesus to the Almighty Creator God contravenes the original commandments given to Patriarch Moses. Free yourself, my dear ones in the name of Jesus who said “You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free!” You are invited to positively criticise every sentence or proposition in all of this lengthy discourse, backed up with relevant Bible quotations as has been done here and correct or modify our errors provided you are very objective and can carry humanity along with you!
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue, D.Sc.
E-mail: agunabu1948@gmail.com& saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk
INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT is a universal spiritual fellowship for all natural scientists and rational human being who can decipher the truth despite centuries of deceit, subterfuge and indoctrinations. Equating Jesus to the Almighty Creator God contravenes the original commandments given to Patriarch Moses. Free yourself, my dear ones in the name of Jesus who said “You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free!” You are invited to positively criticise every sentence or proposition in all of this lengthy discourse, backed up with relevant Bible quotations as has been done here and correct or modify our errors provided you are very objective and can carry humanity along with you!
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue, D.Sc.
E-mail: agunabu1948@gmail.com& saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk
Collapse
this post
Re: JESUS
WAS THE SON OF JOSEPH CHOSEN BY GOD...
Hide comments
This is belief, not truth. Who wrote
"John" and when?
You are a religious pygmy, an intellectual deceit!
MICHAEL SHERLOCK How can you just write " This is belief, not
truth. Who wrote "John" and when?" May be you are the
great grand son of Sherlock Holmes who was used to depict so many detective
stories and never have grown out of fantasies and fables. WHO WROTE John IS A CONTR OVERSI AL
ISSUE but as long as you fanatics of Christendom still use it, you cannot
excise my quotations from thereof. You Are A Deceit . Read John 8, verses 31 -
47 and see that you are a great grandson of the Snake through Cain the
first murderer.
I have no idea what you are saying!
Don't ever make comments on what you are an illiterate!
You are not qualified to discuss RELIGION.
I have written a book called, 'I Am Christ:The
Crucifixion-Painful Truths. Also, I have a forum called, 'I Am
Christ Forum,' here is the link if you are interested:http://iamchristforum.com/christ/content.php
KInd regards. Michael Sherlock
You have to go back and start all over. Is it not
divinely providential that the Holy Spirit permitted you to see what he
dictated to me for over 35 years, which I reluctantly penned down so the scales
on your eyes will fall and you now can see clearly? Type in : Danmbaezue
Jideofo Kenechukwu into the Goggle Search and be overwhelmed with more than
20 more inspired dissertations downloaded from above for humanity to end the
UNIVERSAL IDOLATRY started in Rome by a Pagan Emperor. MAY THE CREATOR BESTOW
ON YOU JUST A TENT H OF THE WISDOM HE GAVE TO THE YOUNG KING
SOLOMON WHO EARNESTLY PRAYED FOR KNOWLEDGE. Imitate Solomon, and then wait for
as long as it pleases the Divine to grant your request. Remain Blessed in Jesus
Name!
Expand this comment »
Gabriel was a smart woman-chaser like guys of today and said what all women would fall for! However, Jesus never became King and she kept mute in shame!
She could have copied Zorah’s example; the wife of Monah, parents of Samson!
She should have told Angel Gabriel she was engaged not that she was a virgin!
She was naive and fell for the Queen Mother position if Jesus became King!
Joseph was also naive and fell for the same reasons as Mary did, King’s Father!
Whether God used In Vitro fertilisation or Gabriel did, WHO IS FATHER TO JESUS?
1 And the children of
1 And the people of
Jg
ACC FBN JFB JWN MHC MHCC TSK
2 And there was a certain man of Zorah, of the family of the Danites, whose name was Manoah; and his wife was barren, and bare not. (KJV)
2 And there was a certain man of Zorah, of the tribe of the Danites, whose name was Manoah; and his wife was barren and had no children. (RSV)
Jos 19:41
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
3 And the angel of the LORD appeared unto the woman, and said unto her, Behold now, thou art barren, and bearest not: but thou shalt conceive, and bear a son. (KJV)
3 And the angel of the LORD appeared to the woman and said to her, "Behold, you are barren and have no children; but you shall conceive and bear a son. (RSV)
Jg 6:12; Lu 1:11,13,28,31
ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
4 Now therefore beware, I pray thee, and drink not wine nor strong drink, and eat not any unclean thing: (KJV)
4 Therefore beware, and drink no wine or strong drink, and eat nothing unclean, (RSV)
Nu 6:2-3,20; Jg 13:14; Lu 1:15
ACC FBN JWN TSK
5 For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and no razor shall come on his head: for the child shall be a Nazarite unto God from the womb: and he shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines. (KJV)
5 for lo, you shall conceive and bear a son. No razor shall come upon his head, for the boy shall be a Nazirite to God from birth; and he shall begin to deliver
Nu 6:2,5; 1Sa 1:11; 7:13; 2Sa 8:1; 1Ch 18:1
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
6 Then the woman came and told her husband, saying, A man of God came unto me, and his countenance was like the countenance of an angel of God, very terrible: but I asked him not whence he was, neither told he me his name: (KJV)
6 Then the woman came and told her husband, "A man of God came to me, and his countenance was like the countenance of the angel of God, very terrible; I did not ask him whence he was, and he did not tell me his name; (RSV)
De 33:1; Jg 13:17-18; 1Sa 2:27; 9:6; 1Ki 17:24; Mt 28:3; Lu 9:29; Ac 6:15
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
7 But he said unto me, Behold, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and now drink no wine nor strong drink, neither eat any unclean thing: for the child shall be a Nazarite to God from the womb to the day of his death. (KJV)
7 but he said to me, 'Behold, you shall conceive and bear a son; so then drink no wine or strong drink, and eat nothing unclean, for the boy shall be a Nazirite to God from birth to the day of his death.'" (RSV)
TSK
8 Then Manoah intreated the LORD, and said, O my Lord, let the man of God which thou didst send come again unto us, and teach us what we shall do unto the child that shall be born. (KJV)
8 Then Manoah entreated the LORD, and said, "O, LORD, I pray thee, let the man of God whom thou didst send come again to us, and teach us what we are to do with the boy that will be born." (RSV)
GBN FBN MHC MHCC
9 And God hearkened to the voice of Manoah; and the angel of God came again unto the woman as she sat in the field: but Manoah her husband was not with her. (KJV)
9 And God listened to the voice of Manoah, and the angel of God came again to the woman as she sat in the field; but Manoah her husband was not with her. (RSV)
ACC FBN TSK
10 And the woman made haste, and ran, and shewed her husband, and said unto him, Behold, the man hath appeared unto me, that came unto me the other day. (KJV)
10 And the woman ran in haste and told her husband, "Behold, the man who came to me the other day has appeared to me." (RSV)
GBN TSK
11 And Manoah arose, and went after his wife, and came to the man, and said unto him, Art thou the man that spakest unto the woman? And he said, I am. (KJV)
11 And Manoah arose and went after his wife, and came to the man and said to him, "Are you the man who spoke to this woman?" And he said, "I am." (RSV)
GBN JFB TSK
12 And Manoah said, Now let thy words come to pass. How shall we order the child, and how shall we do unto him? {How shall we order...: Heb. What shall be the manner of the, etc} {how shall we do...: or, what shall he do?: Heb. what shall be his work?} (KJV)
12 And Manoah said, "Now when your words come true, what is to be the boy's manner of life, and what is he to do?" (RSV)
FBN JWN TSK
13 And the angel of the LORD said unto Manoah, Of all that I said unto the woman let her beware. (KJV)
13 And the angel of the LORD said to Manoah, "Of all that I said to the woman let her beware. (RSV)
FBN JWN TSK
14 She may not eat of any thing that cometh of the vine, neither let her drink wine or strong drink, nor eat any unclean thing: all that I commanded her let her observe. (KJV)
14 She may not eat of anything that comes from the vine, neither let her drink wine or strong drink, or eat any unclean thing; all that I commanded her let her observe." (RSV)
Nu 6:3-4; Jg 13:4
GBN TSK
15 And Manoah said unto the angel of the LORD, I pray thee, let us detain thee, until we shall have made ready a kid for thee. {for thee: Heb. before thee} (KJV)
15 Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, "Pray, let us detain you, and prepare a kid for you." (RSV)
Ge 18:5; Jg 6:18
ACC FBN JFB JWN MHC MHCC TSK
16 And the angel of the LORD said unto Manoah, Though thou detain me, I will not eat of thy bread: and if thou wilt offer a burnt offering, thou must offer it unto the LORD. For Manoah knew not that he was an angel of the LORD. (KJV)
16 And the angel of the LORD said to Manoah, "If you detain me, I will not eat of your food; but if you make ready a burnt offering, then offer it to the LORD." (For Manoah did not know that he was the angel of the LORD.) (RSV)
GBN ACC JWN TSK
17 And Manoah said unto the angel of the LORD, What is thy name, that when thy sayings come to pass we may do thee honour? (KJV)
17 And Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, "What is your name, so that, when your words come true, we may honor you?" (RSV)
JFB JWN TSK
18 And the angel of the LORD said unto him, Why askest thou thus after my name, seeing it is secret? {secret: or, wonderful} (KJV)
18 And the angel of the LORD said to him, "Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?" (RSV)
Ge 32:29; Isa 9:6
ACC FBN JWN TSK
19 So Manoah took a kid with a meat offering, and offered it upon a rock unto the LORD: and the angel did wondrously; and Manoah and his wife looked on. (KJV)
19 So Manoah took the kid with the cereal offering, and offered it upon the rock to the LORD, to him who works wonders. (RSV)
Jg 6:19-31
GBN ACC JWN TSK
20 For it came to pass, when the flame went up toward heaven from off the altar, that the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame of the altar. And Manoah and his wife looked on it, and fell on their faces to the ground. (KJV)
20 And when the flame went up toward heaven from the altar, the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame of the altar while Manoah and his wife looked on; and they fell on their faces to the ground. (RSV)
Le
FBN JWN TSK
21 But the angel of the LORD did no more appear to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that he was an angel of the LORD. (KJV)
21 The angel of the LORD appeared no more to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that he was the angel of the LORD. (RSV)
Jg 6:22
TSK
22 And Manoah said unto his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen God. (KJV)
22 And Manoah said to his wife, "We shall surely die, for we have seen God." (RSV)
Ge 32:30; Ex 33:20; De 5:26; Jg 6:22
ACC TSK
23 But his wife said unto him, If the LORD were pleased to kill us, he would not have received a burnt offering and a meat offering at our hands, neither would he have shewed us all these things, nor would as at this time have told us such things as these. (KJV)
23 But his wife said to him, "If the LORD had meant to kill us, he would not have accepted a burnt offering and a cereal offering at our hands, or shown us all these things, or now announced to us such things as these." (RSV)
GBN ACC JWN TSK
24 And the woman bare a son, and called his name Samson: and the child grew, and the LORD blessed him. (KJV)
24 And the woman bore a son, and called his name Samson; and the boy grew, and the LORD blessed him. (RSV)
1Sa
ACC JFB JWN MHC MHCC TSK
25 And the Spirit of the LORD began to move him at times in the camp of Dan between Zorah and Eshtaol. {the camp...: Heb. Mahanehdan} (KJV)
25 And the Spirit of the LORD began to stir him in Mahanehdan, between Zorah and Eshtaol. (RSV)
Jos 15:33; Jg
ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
1. I hope you can read in-between the lines. Was Zorah
more educated than Mary, No! Her parents were of higher social class and she
taught Jesus the whole Torah before he was 12.
2. Was Zorah more prudent as a wife by going straight to her husband to report the event and seek his interpretation and counsel, Yes!
3. That is exactly what the ambitious and naive Mary should have done! But, did she? No!
4. She fancied how great and nice it would be to be a Queen Mother when the sugar-coated prophetic garbage the extremely beautiful angel spooned her!
The result is the fabrications as to the true paternity of Jesus of Nazareth!
2. Was Zorah more prudent as a wife by going straight to her husband to report the event and seek his interpretation and counsel, Yes!
3. That is exactly what the ambitious and naive Mary should have done! But, did she? No!
4. She fancied how great and nice it would be to be a Queen Mother when the sugar-coated prophetic garbage the extremely beautiful angel spooned her!
The result is the fabrications as to the true paternity of Jesus of Nazareth!
Expand this
comment »
NATIVES OF NAZARETH WERE WISE PHI LOSOPHERS
They asked relevant questions that no one ever bordered to answer nor any group of theologians or religious scholars had answered till this morning 07/08/2012 2:50:56 GMT when the Holy Spirit bestowed on humanity this eye-opener through his humble vessel! But I had asked the same questions and others for years! Current day Christians are satisfied with repeating doctrines and dogmas they crammed as children when their brains were BLANK SLATES and missionaries brainwashed their parents! Many Christians of today are half-baked, half-educated, half-civilised and half-christianised or else tell me why they cannot ask relevant questions as illiterate villagers did/do! An elder in my village asked the white priest that came to evangelise my clan in the early 1940s; “IF GOD HAD A SON THEN HE HAD A PENI S
AND A WIFE. BUT YOU TOLD US THAT GOD IS A SPIRIT, DO SPIRITS NOW HAVE WIVES?” When
will you ask your own questions?
They asked relevant questions that no one ever bordered to answer nor any group of theologians or religious scholars had answered till this morning 07/08/2012 2:50:56 GMT when the Holy Spirit bestowed on humanity this eye-opener through his humble vessel! But I had asked the same questions and others for years! Current day Christians are satisfied with repeating doctrines and dogmas they crammed as children when their brains were BLANK SLATES and missionaries brainwashed their parents! Many Christians of today are half-baked, half-educated, half-civilised and half-christianised or else tell me why they cannot ask relevant questions as illiterate villagers did/do! An elder in my village asked the white priest that came to evangelise my clan in the early 1940s; “IF GOD HAD A SON THEN HE HAD A P
By:
Dr J. K. Danmbaezue a.k.a. Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc.
Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Existential Family Therapist & Research Psychometrician,
The Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Entire Universe.
E-mails: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk or agunabu1948@gmail.com or Tel: 0803-9097614.
Dr J. K. Danmbaezue a.k.a. Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc.
Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Existential Family Therapist & Research Psychometrician,
The Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Almighty Creator of the Entire Universe.
E-mails: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk or agunabu1948@gmail.com or Tel: 0803-9097614.
I TYPE ALL MY SCRI PTS. SO, HOLD ME ACCOUNTABLE
FOR ALL TYPOGRAPHI CAL ERRORS!
ABSTRA CT:
I have deliberately culled the relevant verses of Matthew 13 from the Original Language the Bible was written before all the translations and versions began. Any serious-minded Bible student will do well to cross-check these and acquire the skills of reading Aramaic as it is shown here! RSV translations into English are added!
• Jesus Declared In Plain Language That He Was Only A Prophet And The Son Of The Man Joseph, So Why Was The Universal Idolatry Of Deifying Him By Constantine The Great, A Pagan Emperor, Accepted By The Early Church Fathers? Did Jesus Need To Equate Himself to His Own Father?
• Jesus was a prophet adopted and anointed by the Almighty Creator through the hands of John the Baptist. He was the first-born son of Joseph/Mary, the Carpenter and he had four junior brothers and un-named number of sisters. He was purely human. He never claimed divinity. He declared that he was the Son of Man and finally in the Gospel of Matthew 13:57, he unequivocally affirmed that he was just a prophet. So, why deify him?
DISS ERTATION:
THE BONE OF CONTENTION COMES FROMMATT HEW
13: VERS ES 53-58.
The townsmen of Jesus of Nazareth were not gullible like today’s Christians! They asked probing questions that theologians had refused to answer for centuries!
“53 And when Jesus had finished these parables, he went away from there, (RSV)
54 And <kai> when he was come <erchomai> into <eis> his own <autos> country <patris>, he taught <didasko> them <autos> in <en> their <autos> synagogue <sunagoge>, insomuch that <hoste> they <autos> were astonished <ekplesso>, and <kai> said <lego>, Whence <pothen> hath this man <touto> this <houtos> wisdom <sophia>, and <kai> these mighty works <dunamis>? (KJV)
54 and coming to his own country he taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished, and said, "Where did this man get this wisdom and these mighty works? (RSV)
55 Is <esti> not <ou> this <houtos> the carpenter's <tekton> son <huios>? is <lego> not <ouchi> his <autos> mother <meter> called <lego> Mary <Maria>? and <kai> his <autos> brethren <adelphos>, James <Iakobos>, and <kai> Joses <Ioses>, and <kai> Simon <Simon>, and <kai> Judas <Ioudas>? (KJV)
55 Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? (RSV)
56 And <kai> his <autos> sisters <adelphe>, are they <eisi> not <ouchi> all <pas> with <pros> us <hemas>? Whence <pothen> then <oun> hath this man <touto> all <pas> these things <tauta>? (KJV)
56 And are not all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all this?" (RSV)
Barnes FBN JFBTSK
57 And <kai> they were offended <skandalizo> in <en> him <autos>. But <de> Jesus <Iesous> said <epo> unto them <autos>, A prophet <prophetes> is <esti> not <ou> without honour <atimos>, save <ei me> in <en> his own <autos> country <patris>, and <kai> in <en> his own <autos> house <oikia>. (KJV)
57 And they took offense at him. But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house." (RSV)
58 And <kai> he did <poieo> not <ou> many <polus> mighty works <dunamis> there <ekei> because <dia> of their <autos> unbelief <apistia>. (KJV)
58 And he did not do many mighty works there, because of their unbelief. (RSV)”
THEOSOPHICAL MICRODIAGNOSIS
Current day uninformed fanatics of the Roman brand of Christianity concocted by Roman Emperor Constantine and Saul of Tarsus that were ratified by the Council of Nicea must open their eyes that had/has been partially blinded for centuries by fables, legends, theories, doctrines and dogmas conceived, developed, nurtured and patented in Rome that they were forced to swallow as infants in catechism classes!
I am not a disciple of Karl Marx but I can recognise the truth whenever, wherever and however it is told in a simple language. Present-day Christians can be compared to drug dependents hypnotised with doctrines/dogmas or to healthy human beings who prefer to walk around on orthopaedic clutches whereas their feet are 100% okay! It is pure stagnation of the freedom to think independently as Homo sapiens. It is a universal slavery of the human person. It is abject poverty of the mind to swallow toxic wastes manufactured by others by resigning one’s ability to think straight. It is psychopathological! It was/is the greatest regression or buffoonery of mankind all through the ages; a wholesale subjugation to imperialism.
Where have all the miracles Jesus and the proclaimed saints of the Papacy been imprisoned that no victims of religious violence are protected miraculously from attacks from the children of the evil one? Where have all the miracle workers and television evangelists of Christendom disappeared to, such that none prays so that when tithe-paying members of their congregations are bombed, they do not succeed in their demonic machinations! Are there a paucity of signs & wonders and a drought of “Praise the Lord, Halleluiahs” or “Remain blessed in the Lord, Amen?”
Please wake up from your centuries of hypnotic slumbering and feeding on paediatric malnourishing milk produced, bottled, labelled and marketed worldwide by demonic clerics resident inRome
Come my dear Friends, Let us put on our thinking caps and for once truly earn the appellation; “ Homo sapiens"! Dare to be different and trust your intelligence!!
AB
I have deliberately culled the relevant verses of Matthew 13 from the Original Language the Bible was written before all the translations and versions began. Any serious-minded Bible student will do well to cross-check these and acquire the skills of reading Aramaic as it is shown here! RSV translations into English are added!
• Jesus Declared In Plain Language That He Was Only A Prophet And The Son Of The Man Joseph, So Why Was The Universal Idolatry Of Deifying Him By Constantine The Great, A Pagan Emperor, Accepted By The Early Church Fathers? Did Jesus Need To Equate Himself to His Own Father?
• Jesus was a prophet adopted and anointed by the Almighty Creator through the hands of John the Baptist. He was the first-born son of Joseph/Mary, the Carpenter and he had four junior brothers and un-named number of sisters. He was purely human. He never claimed divinity. He declared that he was the Son of Man and finally in the Gospel of Matthew 13:57, he unequivocally affirmed that he was just a prophet. So, why deify him?
THE BONE OF CONTENTION COMES FROM
The townsmen of Jesus of Nazareth were not gullible like today’s Christians! They asked probing questions that theologians had refused to answer for centuries!
“53 And when Jesus had finished these parables, he went away from there, (RSV)
54 And <kai> when he was come <erchomai> into <eis> his own <autos> country <patris>, he taught <didasko> them <autos> in <en> their <autos> synagogue <sunagoge>, insomuch that <hoste> they <autos> were astonished <ekplesso>, and <kai> said <lego>, Whence <pothen> hath this man <touto> this <houtos> wisdom <sophia>, and <kai> these mighty works <dunamis>? (KJV)
54 and coming to his own country he taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished, and said, "Where did this man get this wisdom and these mighty works? (RSV)
55 Is <esti> not <ou> this <houtos> the carpenter's <tekton> son <huios>? is <lego> not <ouchi> his <autos> mother <meter> called <lego> Mary <Maria>? and <kai> his <autos> brethren <adelphos>, James <Iakobos>, and <kai> Joses <Ioses>, and <kai> Simon <Simon>, and <kai> Judas <Ioudas>? (KJV)
55 Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? (RSV)
56 And <kai> his <autos> sisters <adelphe>, are they <eisi> not <ouchi> all <pas> with <pros> us <hemas>? Whence <pothen> then <oun> hath this man <touto> all <pas> these things <tauta>? (KJV)
56 And are not all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all this?" (RSV)
Barnes FBN JFB
57 And <kai> they were offended <skandalizo> in <en> him <autos>. But <de> Jesus <Iesous> said <epo> unto them <autos>, A prophet <prophetes> is <esti> not <ou> without honour <atimos>, save <ei me> in <en> his own <autos> country <patris>, and <kai> in <en> his own <autos> house <oikia>. (KJV)
57 And they took offense at him. But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house." (RSV)
58 And <kai> he did <poieo> not <ou> many <polus> mighty works <dunamis> there <ekei> because <dia> of their <autos> unbelief <apistia>. (KJV)
58 And he did not do many mighty works there, because of their unbelief. (RSV)”
THEOSOPHICAL MICRODIAGN
Current day uninformed fanatics of the Roman brand of Christianity concocted by Roman Emperor Constantine and Saul of Tarsus that were ratified by the Council of Nicea must open their eyes that had/has been partially blinded for centuries by fables, legends, theories, doctrines and dogmas conceived, developed, nurtured and patented in Rome that they were forced to swallow as infants in catechism classes!
I am not a disciple of Karl Marx but I can recognise the truth whenever, wherever and however it is told in a simple language. Present-day Christians can be compared to drug dependents hypnotised with doctrines/dogmas or to healthy human beings who prefer to walk around on orthopaedic clutches whereas their feet are 100% okay! It is pure stagnation of the freedom to think independently as Homo sapiens. It is a universal slavery of the human person. It is abject poverty of the mind to swallow toxic wastes manufactured by others by resigning one’s ability to think straight. It is psychopathological! It was/is the greatest regression or buffoonery of mankind all through the ages; a wholesale subjugation to imperialism.
Where have all the miracles Jesus and the proclaimed saints of the Papacy been imprisoned that no victims of religious violence are protected miraculously from attacks from the children of the evil one? Where have all the miracle workers and television evangelists of Christendom disappeared to, such that none prays so that when tithe-paying members of their congregations are bombed, they do not succeed in their demonic machinations! Are there a paucity of signs & wonders and a drought of “Praise the Lord, Halleluiahs” or “Remain blessed in the Lord, Amen?”
Please wake up from your centuries of hypnotic slumbering and feeding on paediatric malnourishing milk produced, bottled, labelled and marketed worldwide by demonic clerics resident in
Come my dear Friends, Let us put on our thinking caps and for once truly earn the appellation; “ Homo sapiens"! Dare to be different and trust your intelligence!!
+Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc., the Humble Vessel of the Holy Spirit of the Creator.
QU
1. Was Joseph truly a native of
2. Where and why did the relatives of Joseph not come to rejoice with him and the wife after the successful childbirth?
3. Were the shepherds and the Three Wise Kings the uncles of Jesus that they were conscripted to do play the roles and duties of blood relatives?
4. Where is the narrative of what Jesus did as an infant with his peers?
5. Where was Jesus from ages 12 to 30 that were not narrated in the Bible?
6. Was ‘Jesus of
7. Was Nathaniel wrong in his; ‘Can Anything Good Come Out of
8. Was Luke not falsifying genealogical records and lying by grafting a royal descent from the lineage of David apparently to fulfil the prophecies?
9. Was the genealogical tree of Jesus traced by Matthew not more authentic than that of Luke who was neither an apostle nor a live participant?
10. Where was Joseph all through his son’s ministry and how did he disappear after the return from trekking to and fro
These are but just a
few of the questions that had/have and still agitate my mind since my teenage
years in the minor seminary and adolescent years in the major seminary I
attended. To date, no one has veritable answers for any of them? Can any of the
glorified theologians or historians come to our rescue with the truth?
Was his popular designation ‘JESUS OF NAZARETH ’,
a misnomer? No one ever designated him “Jesus of Bethlehem” or “ Jesus of
Jerusalem” nor “ Jesus of Galilee” although occasionally he was referred to as
a “Nazarene” or a “Galilean”.
Was his popular designation ‘JESUS OF NAZAR
The question to find
an answer to is this; What Brought About The False Genealogy Hoisted On Him By
Luke Who Was Neither An Apostle Nor A Live-Witness Of His Times? “A stitch in
time saves nine” was one of the earliest English proverbs I learnt in the 1950s
when we attended Colonial Missionary Schools. I am now 64 years old.
Unfortunately, we have
arrived at this computer age and our children have access to electronic
encyclopaedias. They browse and surf the Internet. I am only blowing the
whistle so as to pre-empt the MASS EXODUS OF LUKEWARM CHRISTIANS to other
international religions that are more receptive to scientific concepts, which
can satisfy the inquisitive mind!
I am declaring this urgent S.O.S in Jesus name! Please come to my rescue before I drown in apostasy. Send your convincing answers to Dr Kenez via; E-mails: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk oragunabu@gmail.com
MYDEAR CHRISTIAN FRIEND,
I am declaring this urgent S.O.S in Jesus name! Please come to my rescue before I drown in apostasy. Send your convincing answers to Dr Kenez via; E-mails: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk oragunabu@gmail.com
MY
YOU CAN SEE I SHARE SIMILAR QUESTI ONS
ON THE FORGERIE S AND DIATRI BES THE ROMAN CHURCH INTRODUCED TO GENU INE CHRISTIAN MESSAGE THAT SAUL OF TARSUS ROU GHT TO ROME NATI VE OF ROME BAC KED OVER TO NAZARETH BETHLEHEM ERIE S ROMAN PAGAN ISM
TINKERED WITH FOR CENT URIES WHAT
JESUS, PETER, JAMES & JOHN
TAUGHT? JOIN ME IN EXPO SING THESE
COOKERIE S AND LET US FIND A GLOB AL FAIT H
FOR A GLOB AL PEACE IN A GLOB AL VILLAGE WE NOW
LIVE IN.
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue, D.Sc. in Psychometrics
Revolutionary Professor of Modern Theosophy & Animator of Integrational Spiritan Movement.
Phone: 0803-9097614, 0805-1764999 or 0809-6765365
Let me oblige you with my websites, so you can sharpen your logic and assist me OPEN THEEYES OF GENU INE SEEKERS OF JESUS, THE MESSIAH THAT ACCEPTED
TO DIE ON A CROS S, not the Godhead
that Roman Paganism has set up against the ALMIGHTY FATHER who created him and
raised him from the grave!
ALL THEWEBS ITES OF MEMBERS OF KENEZ FAMILY
www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com
integrationalspiritanmovement
kenezhealthklinik
http:wwwrenascentigborel.blogspot.com
alicebusinesscollege
worldcontroversyunlimited
globalcontroversiesunlimited
The subtitles for the second, the third & the sixth in case they are difficult to find are;
• mission statement | integrationalspiritanmovement
• new drug for managing hiv aids by hafani research consortium | kenezhealthklinik
• welcome to the international philosophers forum | worldcontroversyunlimited
Here are members of my bloggers, ASK: http://support.google.com/blogger
• http://wwwrenigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://integrationaspiritanmovement.blogspot.com/
• http://wwwrenascentigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://wwwrenasigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://renascentigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://renascenti.blogspot.com/
GOOGLE URL PROFILE S SITE FOR DR
KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE
https://profiles.google.com/100752842609304318747 OR https://profiles.google.com/agunabu1948
LINKEDIN PROFILE ADDRESS/NUMBER
http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/dr-j-kenechukwu-danmbaezue/51/393/591
Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue, D.Sc. in Psychometrics
Revolutionary Professor of Modern Theosophy & Animator of Integrational Spiritan Movement.
Phone: 0803-9097614, 0805-1764999 or 0809-6765365
Let me oblige you with my websites, so you can sharpen your logic and assist me OPEN THE
ALL THE
www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com
integrationalspiritanmovement
kenezhealthklinik
http:wwwrenascentigborel.blogspot.com
alicebusinesscollege
worldcontroversyunlimited
globalcontroversiesunlimited
The subtitles for the second, the third & the sixth in case they are difficult to find are;
• mission statement | integrationalspiritanmovement
• new drug for managing hiv aids by hafani research consortium | kenezhealthklinik
• welcome to the international philosophers forum | worldcontroversyunlimited
Here are members of my bloggers, ASK: http://support.google.com/blogger
• http://wwwrenigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://integrationaspiritanmovement.blogspot.com/
• http://wwwrenascentigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://wwwrenasigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://renascentigborel.blogspot.com/
• http://renascenti.blogspot.com/
GOOGLE URL PRO
https://profiles.google.com/100752842609304318747 OR https://profiles.google.com/agunabu1948
LINKEDIN PROFILE ADDRESS/NUMBER
http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/dr-j-kenechukwu-danmbaezue/51/393/591
Expand this
comment »
Can you find any
evidence that the town of Nazareth
Dear Mike, I am not a historian. Names change over
centuries and so do maps. Forget it! That is infinitesimal compared to exposing
the forgeries in the Bible! Answer this: WHO WERE THE BIOLOGICAL FATHERS OF
CAIN & ABEL? Adam's First Son is emphatically stated in Genesis 5 with
double emphasis on ‘In his own IMAGE’ & ‘In his LIKENESS’? Falsifications
by Pagan Theologians started right from Genesis, My Dear. Send me answers in
seven days, please! Remain A Student of the Truth! WELCOME ON BOARD.
There is no evidence
for your assertion.
--
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who
has found it. MANLY P. HALL
--
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who
has found it. MANLY P. HALL
Impulsiveness is a sure sign of NAIVETY, my dear and you
are definitely puerile in your spontaneity in exposing your illogical
and unwise misdemeanour!
See the cliché you posted just beside your infantile vituperation! That says it all, YOU ARE THE ONE BEHAVING AS YOU HAVE FOUND ALL THE TRUTH THERE IS TO FIND!
You were only asked to search for answers within seven days and because you are a demented fanatic and 'I KNOW IT ALL MENTALITY' you didn't even wait for an hour, ten hours, a day to pass and already you have stupidly responded like you did before.
PLEASE DO NOTWRI TE ME AGAIN AS I
SEE YOU HAVE A PSYCHOPATHIC ETIOLOGY FOR YOU MYOPIC VISION.
See the cliché you posted just beside your infantile vituperation! That says it all, YOU ARE THE ONE BEHAVING AS YOU HAVE FOUND ALL THE TRUTH THERE IS TO FIND!
You were only asked to search for answers within seven days and because you are a demented fanatic and 'I KNOW IT ALL MENTALITY' you didn't even wait for an hour, ten hours, a day to pass and already you have stupidly responded like you did before.
PLEASE DO NOT
"A fool at forty", the English say, "is a
fool forever"
ANGEL GABRIEL CLAIMED PATERNITY OF JESUS BY GIVING HIM
A NAME
My dear readers, there is no smoke without fire! InBiafra ,
as in so many communities all over the world, it is the honour and duties of
fathers to give names to their children. The Israelites are even more conscious
of this culture. All through the Old Testament that had been their tradition.
26 And <de> in <en> the sixth <hektos> month <men> the angel <aggelos> Gabriel <Gabriel> was sent <apostello> from <hupo> God <theos> unto <eis> a city <polis> of Galilee <Galilaia>, named <hos> <onoma> Nazareth <Nazareth>, (KJV)
26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN MHC MHCC PNTC RWP TFG TSK WBN
27 To <pros> a virgin <parthenos> espoused <mnesteuo> to a man <aner> whose <hos> name <onoma> was Joseph <Ioseph>, of <ek> the house <oikos> of David <Dabid>; and <kai> the virgin's <parthenos> name <onoma> was Mary <Maria>. (KJV)
27 to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. (RSV)
Mt1:18 ; Lu 2:4-5
GBN ACC Barnes JWN PNTC RWP TFG TSK
28 And <kai> the angel <aggelos> came in <eiserchomai> unto <pros> her <autos>, and said <epo>, Hail <chairo>, thou that art highly favoured <charitoo>, the Lord <kurios> is with <meta> thee <sou>: blessed <eulogeo> art thou <su> among <en> women <gune>. {highly...: or, graciously accepted, or, of much grace} (KJV)
28 And he came to her and said, "Hail, O favored one, the Lord is with you!" (RSV)
Jg 6:12; Da9:23 ; 10:19 ; Lu 1:30
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN RWP TFG TSK
29 And <de> when she saw <eido> him, she was troubled <diatarasso> at <epi> his <autos> saying <logos>, and <kai> cast in her mind <dialogizomai> what manner <potapos> of salutation <aspasmos> this <houtos> should be <eien>. (KJV)
29 But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and considered in her mind what sort of greeting this might be. (RSV)
Lu 1:12
GBN ACC Barnes FBN RWP TFG TSK
30 And <kai> the angel <aggelos> said <epo> unto her <autos>, Fear <phobeo> not <me>, Mary <Maria>: for <gar> thou hast found <heurisko> favour <charis> with <para> God <theos>. (KJV)
30 And the angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. (RSV)
31 And <kai>, behold <idou>, thou shalt conceive <sullambano> in <en> thy womb <gaster>, and <kai> bring forth <tikto> a son <huios>, and <kai> shalt call <kaleo> his <autos> name <onoma> JESUS <Iesous>. (KJV)
31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. (RSV)
Isa 7:14; Mt 1:21; Lu 2:21
ACC Barnes FBN JFB RWP TFG TSK
32 He <houtos> shall be <esomai> great <megas>, and <kai> shall be called <kaleo> the Son <huios> of the Highest <hupsistos>: and <kai> the Lord <kurios> God <theos> shall give <didomi> unto him <autos> the throne <thronos> of his <autos> father <pater> David <Dabid>: (KJV)
32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, (RSV)
2Sa 7:11-12; Ps 132:11; Isa 9:6-7; 16:5; Jer 23:5; Mr 5:7; Re 3:7
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN RWP TFG TSK
33 And <kai> he shall reign <basileuo> over <epi> the house <oikos> of Jacob <Iakob> for <eis> ever <aion>; and <kai> of his <autos> kingdom <basileia> there shall be <esomai> no <ou> end <telos>. (KJV)
33 and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end." (RSV)
GOD CLAIMED PATERNITY FOR THE MUD HE MOULDED AND BREATHED INTO ITS NOSTRILS TO GIVE LIFE; BY NAMING HIM ADAMA / ADAM
26 And God <'elohiym> said <'amar>, Let us make <`asah> man <'adam> in our image <tselem>, after our likeness <d@muwth>: and let them have dominion <radah> over the fish <dagah> of the sea <yam>, and over the fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and over the cattle <b@hemah>, and over all the earth <'erets>, and over every creeping thing <remes> that creepeth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>. (KJV)
26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth." (RSV)
Ge 5:1; 9:2,6; Ps 8:6; 100:3; Ec 7:29; Ac 17:26,28-29; 1Co 11:7; Eph 4:24; Col 3:10; Jas 3:9
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN MHC MHCC TSK
27 So God <'elohiym> created <bara'> man <'adam> in his own image <tselem>, in the image <tselem> of God <'elohiym> created <bara'> he him; male <zakar> and female <n@qebah> created <bara'> he them. (KJV)
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (RSV)
Ge 5:2; Mal 2:15; Mt 19:4; Mr 10:6; 1Co 11:7
JWN TSK
28 And God <'elohiym> blessed <barak> them, and God <'elohiym> said <'amar> unto them, Be fruitful <parah>, and multiply <rabah>, and replenish <male'> the earth <'erets>, and subdue it <kabash>: and have dominion <radah> over the fish <dagah> of the sea <yam>, and over the fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and over every living thing <chay> that moveth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>. {moveth: Heb. creepeth} (KJV)
28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." (RSV)
Ge 9:1,7; Le 26:9; Ps 127:3; 128:3-4
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
29 And God <'elohiym> said <'amar>, Behold <hinneh>, I have given <nathan> you every herb <`eseb> bearing <zara`> seed <zera`>, which is upon the face <paniym> of all the earth <'erets>, and every tree <`ets>, in the which is the fruit <p@riy> of a tree <`ets> yielding <zara`> seed <zera`>; to you it shall be <hayah> for meat <'oklah>. {bearing...: Heb. seeding seed} {yielding...: Heb. seeding seed} (KJV)
29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food. (RSV)
Ge 9:3; Job 36:31; Ps 104:14-15; 136:25; 146:7; Ac 14:17
GBN ACC FBN JWN MHC MHCC TSK
30 And to every beast <chay> of the earth <'erets>, and to every fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and to every thing that creepeth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>, wherein there is life <chay> <nephesh>, I have given every green <yereq> herb <`eseb> for meat <'oklah>: and it was so. {life: Heb. a living soul} (KJV)
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food." And it was so. (RSV)
Job 38:41; Ps 145:15-16; 147:9
JWN TSK
31 And God <'elohiym> saw <ra'ah> every thing that <'aher> he had made <`asah>, and, behold, it was very <m@`od> good <towb>. And the evening <`ereb> and the morning <boqer> were the sixth <shishshiy> day <yowm>. {And the evening...: Heb. And the evening was, and the morning was etc.} (KJV)
31 And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day. (RSV)
ADAMA EQUALLY CLAIMED PATERNITY BY GIVING THE NAME “WOMAN” TO EVE, AFTER ALL IT WAS HIS RIB THAT GAVE EXISTENCE TO EVE
21 And the LORD <Y@hovah> God <'elohiym> caused <naphal> a deep sleep <tardemah> to fall <naphal> upon Adam <'Adam>, and he slept <yashen>: and he took <laqach> one <'echad> of his ribs <tsela`>, and closed up <cagar> the flesh <basar> instead thereof; (KJV)
21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh; (RSV)
Ge 15:12; 1Sa 26:12
ACC JFB JWN MHC TSK
22 And the rib <tsela`>, which the LORD <Y@hovah> God <'elohiym> had taken <laqach> from man <'adam>, made <banah> he a woman <'ishshah>, and brought <bow'> her unto the man <'adam>. {made: Heb. builded} (KJV)
22 and the rib which the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. (RSV)
Pr18:22 ; Heb 13:4
GBN JWN TSK
23 And Adam <'adam> said <'amar>, This <zo'th> is now <pa`am> bone <`etsem> of my bones <`etsem>, and flesh <basar> of my flesh <basar>: she <zo'th> shall be called <qara'> Woman <'ishshah>, because she <zo'th> was taken <laqach> out of Man <'iysh>. {Woman: Heb. Isha} {Man: Heb. Ish} (KJV)
23 Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out ofMan.
Ge 29:14; Jg 9:2; 2Sa 5:1; 19:13; 1Co 11:8-9; Eph 5:28-30
EVE GAVE NAMES TO BOTH CAIN AND ABEL AS ADAM REFUSED TO NAME THEM BECAUSE ONLY EVE KNEW THIER FATHERS
FROM NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE
Genesis 4
4:1 Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, "With the help of the LORD I have brought forth a man."
2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil.
C. The Two Brothers. 4:1-26.
Wycliffe Bible Commentary
Genesis 4:1-2
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
Cain (Qayin). The word Cain is usually associated with the Hebrew word (qana), "to acquire" or "to get." The derivation is based on the resemblance of sound, rather than on basic etymology. It might be called a play on words. The actual meaning of the word possibly came through the Arabic ("a lance" or "a smith"). Eve was overjoyed at the birth of her son. She exclaimed, "I have gotten a man." 2. Abel (Hebel). The name given to the second son indicates "a fleeting breath" or "a vapor." The cognate Accadian word aplu means son. Abel was the originator of pastoral life, while Cain followed his father in the pursuit of agriculture.
(from The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1962 by Moody Press)
My dear readers, there is no smoke without fire! In
26 And <de> in <en> the sixth <hektos> month <men> the angel <aggelos> Gabriel <Gabriel> was sent <apostello> from <hupo> God <theos> unto <eis> a city <polis> of Galilee <Galilaia>, named <hos> <onoma> Nazareth <Nazareth>, (KJV)
26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, (RSV)
GBN ACC Barnes JFB JWN MHC MHCC PNTC RWP TFG TSK WBN
27 To <pros> a virgin <parthenos> espoused <mnesteuo> to a man <aner> whose <hos> name <onoma> was Joseph <Ioseph>, of <ek> the house <oikos> of David <Dabid>; and <kai> the virgin's <parthenos> name <onoma> was Mary <Maria>. (KJV)
27 to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. (RSV)
Mt
GBN ACC Barnes JWN PNTC RWP TFG TSK
28 And <kai> the angel <aggelos> came in <eiserchomai> unto <pros> her <autos>, and said <epo>, Hail <chairo>, thou that art highly favoured <charitoo>, the Lord <kurios> is with <meta> thee <sou>: blessed <eulogeo> art thou <su> among <en> women <gune>. {highly...: or, graciously accepted, or, of much grace} (KJV)
28 And he came to her and said, "Hail, O favored one, the Lord is with you!" (RSV)
Jg 6:12; Da
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN RWP TFG TSK
29 And <de> when she saw <eido> him, she was troubled <diatarasso> at <epi> his <autos> saying <logos>, and <kai> cast in her mind <dialogizomai> what manner <potapos> of salutation <aspasmos> this <houtos> should be <eien>. (KJV)
29 But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and considered in her mind what sort of greeting this might be. (RSV)
Lu 1:12
GBN ACC Barnes FBN RWP TFG TSK
30 And <kai> the angel <aggelos> said <epo> unto her <autos>, Fear <phobeo> not <me>, Mary <Maria>: for <gar> thou hast found <heurisko> favour <charis> with <para> God <theos>. (KJV)
30 And the angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. (RSV)
31 And <kai>, behold <idou>, thou shalt conceive <sullambano> in <en> thy womb <gaster>, and <kai> bring forth <tikto> a son <huios>, and <kai> shalt call <kaleo> his <autos> name <onoma> JESUS <Iesous>. (KJV)
31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. (RSV)
Isa 7:14; Mt 1:21; Lu 2:21
ACC Barnes FBN JFB RWP TFG TSK
32 He <houtos> shall be <esomai> great <megas>, and <kai> shall be called <kaleo> the Son <huios> of the Highest <hupsistos>: and <kai> the Lord <kurios> God <theos> shall give <didomi> unto him <autos> the throne <thronos> of his <autos> father <pater> David <Dabid>: (KJV)
32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, (RSV)
2Sa 7:11-12; Ps 132:11; Isa 9:6-7; 16:5; Jer 23:5; Mr 5:7; Re 3:7
GBN ACC Barnes FBN JFB JWN RWP TFG TSK
33 And <kai> he shall reign <basileuo> over <epi> the house <oikos> of Jacob <Iakob> for <eis> ever <aion>; and <kai> of his <autos> kingdom <basileia> there shall be <esomai> no <ou> end <telos>. (KJV)
33 and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end." (RSV)
GOD CLAIMED PATERNITY FOR THE MUD HE MOULDED AND BREATHED INTO ITS NOSTRILS TO GIVE LIFE; BY NAMING HIM ADAMA / ADAM
26 And God <'elohiym> said <'amar>, Let us make <`asah> man <'adam> in our image <tselem>, after our likeness <d@muwth>: and let them have dominion <radah> over the fish <dagah> of the sea <yam>, and over the fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and over the cattle <b@hemah>, and over all the earth <'erets>, and over every creeping thing <remes> that creepeth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>. (KJV)
26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth." (RSV)
Ge 5:1; 9:2,6; Ps 8:6; 100:3; Ec 7:29; Ac 17:26,28-29; 1Co 11:7; Eph 4:24; Col 3:10; Jas 3:9
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN MHC MHCC TSK
27 So God <'elohiym> created <bara'> man <'adam> in his own image <tselem>, in the image <tselem> of God <'elohiym> created <bara'> he him; male <zakar> and female <n@qebah> created <bara'> he them. (KJV)
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (RSV)
Ge 5:2; Mal 2:15; Mt 19:4; Mr 10:6; 1Co 11:7
JWN TSK
28 And God <'elohiym> blessed <barak> them, and God <'elohiym> said <'amar> unto them, Be fruitful <parah>, and multiply <rabah>, and replenish <male'> the earth <'erets>, and subdue it <kabash>: and have dominion <radah> over the fish <dagah> of the sea <yam>, and over the fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and over every living thing <chay> that moveth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>. {moveth: Heb. creepeth} (KJV)
28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." (RSV)
Ge 9:1,7; Le 26:9; Ps 127:3; 128:3-4
GBN ACC FBN JFB JWN TSK
29 And God <'elohiym> said <'amar>, Behold <hinneh>, I have given <nathan> you every herb <`eseb> bearing <zara`> seed <zera`>, which is upon the face <paniym> of all the earth <'erets>, and every tree <`ets>, in the which is the fruit <p@riy> of a tree <`ets> yielding <zara`> seed <zera`>; to you it shall be <hayah> for meat <'oklah>. {bearing...: Heb. seeding seed} {yielding...: Heb. seeding seed} (KJV)
29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food. (RSV)
Ge 9:3; Job 36:31; Ps 104:14-15; 136:25; 146:7; Ac 14:17
GBN ACC FBN JWN MHC MHCC TSK
30 And to every beast <chay> of the earth <'erets>, and to every fowl <`owph> of the air <shamayim>, and to every thing that creepeth <ramas> upon the earth <'erets>, wherein there is life <chay> <nephesh>, I have given every green <yereq> herb <`eseb> for meat <'oklah>: and it was so. {life: Heb. a living soul} (KJV)
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food." And it was so. (RSV)
Job 38:41; Ps 145:15-16; 147:9
31 And God <'elohiym> saw <ra'ah> every thing that <'aher> he had made <`asah>, and, behold, it was very <m@`od> good <towb>. And the evening <`ereb> and the morning <boqer> were the sixth <shishshiy> day <yowm>. {And the evening...: Heb. And the evening was, and the morning was etc.} (KJV)
31 And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day. (RSV)
ADAMA EQUALLY CLAIMED PATERNITY BY GIVING THE NAME “WOMAN” TO EVE, AFTER ALL IT WAS HIS RIB THAT GAVE EXISTENCE TO EVE
21 And the LORD <Y@hovah> God <'elohiym> caused <naphal> a deep sleep <tardemah> to fall <naphal> upon Adam <'Adam>, and he slept <yashen>: and he took <laqach> one <'echad> of his ribs <tsela`>, and closed up <cagar> the flesh <basar> instead thereof; (KJV)
21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh; (RSV)
Ge 15:12; 1Sa 26:12
ACC JFB JWN MHC TSK
22 And the rib <tsela`>, which the LORD <Y@hovah> God <'elohiym> had taken <laqach> from man <'adam>, made <banah> he a woman <'ishshah>, and brought <bow'> her unto the man <'adam>. {made: Heb. builded} (KJV)
22 and the rib which the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. (RSV)
Pr
GBN JWN TSK
23 And Adam <'adam> said <'amar>, This <zo'th> is now <pa`am> bone <`etsem> of my bones <`etsem>, and flesh <basar> of my flesh <basar>: she <zo'th> shall be called <qara'> Woman <'ishshah>, because she <zo'th> was taken <laqach> out of Man <'iysh>. {Woman: Heb. Isha} {Man: Heb. Ish} (KJV)
23 Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of
Ge 29:14; Jg 9:2; 2Sa 5:1; 19:13; 1Co 11:8-9; Eph 5:28-30
EVE GAVE NAMES TO BOTH CAIN AND ABEL AS ADAM REFUSED TO NAME THEM BECAUSE ONLY EVE KNEW THIER FATHERS
FROM NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE
Genesis 4
4:1 Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, "With the help of the LORD I have brought forth a man."
2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil.
C. The Two Brothers. 4:1-26.
Wycliffe Bible Commentary
Genesis 4:1-2
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
Cain (Qayin). The word Cain is usually associated with the Hebrew word (qana), "to acquire" or "to get." The derivation is based on the resemblance of sound, rather than on basic etymology. It might be called a play on words. The actual meaning of the word possibly came through the Arabic ("a lance" or "a smith"). Eve was overjoyed at the birth of her son. She exclaimed, "I have gotten a man." 2. Abel (Hebel). The name given to the second son indicates "a fleeting breath" or "a vapor." The cognate Accadian word aplu means son. Abel was the originator of pastoral life, while Cain followed his father in the pursuit of agriculture.
(from The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1962 by Moody Press)
FROM MATTHEW HENRY'S
COMMENTARY ON THE WHOLE BIBLE
Genesis 4:1-2
Though God had cast
our first parents out of paradise, he did not write them childless; but, to
show that he had other blessings in store for them, he preserved to them the
benefit of that first blessing of increase. Though they were sinners, nay,
though they felt the humiliation and sorrow of penitents, they did not write
themselves comfortless, having the promise of a Saviour to support themselves
with. We have here, I. The names of their two sons.
1. Cain signifies possession; for Eve, when she bore him, said with joy, and thankfulness, and great expectation, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
2. Abel signifies vanity. When she thought she had obtained the promised seed in Cain, she was so taken up with that possession that another son was as vanity to her.
(from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible: New Modern Edition, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1991 by Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.)
THEREFORE, WE CANSAFE LY CONCLUDE
THAT EVE NAMED BOTH CAIN AND ABEL BEC AUSE
ADAM COULD NOT. HE DID NOT KNOW
WHO WERE THE TRUE FATHERS OF BOTH, SO HE REFR AINED
FROM DOING SO! TO CONFIRM THIS LET US ALSO SEE WHAT THE NET BIBLE HAS TO CONTR IBUTE TO MY THESIS.
1. Cain signifies possession; for Eve, when she bore him, said with joy, and thankfulness, and great expectation, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
2. Abel signifies vanity. When she thought she had obtained the promised seed in Cain, she was so taken up with that possession that another son was as vanity to her.
(from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible: New Modern Edition, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1991 by Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.)
THEREFORE, WE CAN
Genesis 4
The Story of Cain and
Abel
4:1 Now1 the man had marital relations with2 his wife Eve, and she became pregnant3 and gave birth to Cain. Then she said, “I have created4 a man just as the Lord did!”5 4:2 Then she gave birth6 to his brother Abel.7 Abel took care of the flocks, while Cain cultivated the ground.8
From the NET BIBLE. First Edition with the following Commentary
1tn The disjunctive clause (conjunction + subject + verb) introduces a new episode in the ongoing narrative.
2tn Heb “the man knew,” a frequent euphemism for sexual relations.
3tn Or “she conceived.”
4tn Here is another sound play (paronomasia) on a name. The sound of the verb קָנִיתִי (qaniti, “I have created”) reflects the sound of the name Cain in Hebrew (קַיִן, qayin) and gives meaning to it. The saying uses the Qal perfect of קָנָה (qanah). There are two homonymic verbs with this spelling, one meaning “obtain, acquire” and the other meaning “create” (see Gen 14:19, 22; Deut 32:6; Ps 139:13; Prov 8:22). The latter fits this context very well. Eve has created a man.
5tn Heb “with the Lord.” The particle אֶת־ (’et) is not the accusative/object sign, but the preposition “with” as the ancient versions attest. Some take the preposition in the sense of “with the help of” (see BDB 85 s.v. אֵת; cf.NEB 23:28 ). Either works well in this context; the latter is
reflected in the present translation. Some understand אֶת־ as the accusative/object
sign and translate, “I have acquired a man – the Lord.” They suggest that the
woman thought (mistakenly) that she had given birth to the incarnate Lord, the
Messiah who would bruise the Serpent’s head. This fanciful suggestion is based
on a questionable allegorical interpretation of Gen 3:15 (see the note there on
the word “heel”).
4:1 Now1 the man had marital relations with2 his wife Eve, and she became pregnant3 and gave birth to Cain. Then she said, “I have created4 a man just as the Lord did!”5 4:2 Then she gave birth6 to his brother Abel.7 Abel took care of the flocks, while Cain cultivated the ground.8
From the NET BIBLE. First Edition with the following Commentary
1tn The disjunctive clause (conjunction + subject + verb) introduces a new episode in the ongoing narrative.
2tn Heb “the man knew,” a frequent euphemism for sexual relations.
3tn Or “she conceived.”
4tn Here is another sound play (paronomasia) on a name. The sound of the verb קָנִיתִי (qaniti, “I have created”) reflects the sound of the name Cain in Hebrew (קַיִן, qayin) and gives meaning to it. The saying uses the Qal perfect of קָנָה (qanah). There are two homonymic verbs with this spelling, one meaning “obtain, acquire” and the other meaning “create” (see Gen 14:19, 22; Deut 32:6; Ps 139:13; Prov 8:22). The latter fits this context very well. Eve has created a man.
5tn Heb “with the Lord.” The particle אֶת־ (’et) is not the accusative/object sign, but the preposition “with” as the ancient versions attest. Some take the preposition in the sense of “with the help of” (see BDB 85 s.v. אֵת; cf.
My dear readers, there is no smoke without fire! In Biafra , as in so many communities all over the world, it
is the honour and duties of fathers to give names to their children. The
Israelites are even more conscious of this culture. All through the Old
Testament that had been their tradition. If a woman gives a name then the
reasons why she was allowed to do so were/are clearly stated as in the cases of
women who had been barren or suffered long periods in child birth labour pains.
Let us now see the origin of my dissertation on this topic from “The Hottest
Cake in the Universe”; “ANGELIC VERSES” I wrote in 2001!
CHAPTER 6A
A CONTINUATION OF “CAIN’S PATERNITY IN DISPUTE”.
Jude: Sorry my colleagues – I was dumbfounded during our last discourse and I treaded softly – in order to avoid errors and behold – that in itself – was the greatest error.
Jideofo: Enough – we are here – let’s go straight to business. Kindly remind us where stopped, you Christian fanatic.
Jude: Kenez gave us some quotations to read and digest – and the most meaningful to me is – Genesis 5 – I read it through three times and I asked – was Seth the first son of Adam?
Kenez: Now you are coming home! – Did you note the CAPTION – is there any title given to Chapter 5?
Jideofo: Whatever brought in the concept into Kenez mind, I can’t decode – Hey you, Kenez – from where and since when did you start doubting the paternity of Cain?
Kenez: Good – have you even read Genesis, Chapter 4 verse 8 critically in GNB version?
“Then Cain said to his brother Abel, “let’s go out in the fields. When they were out in the fields, Cain turned on his brother and killed him.” You need to sit down and think deep before you arrive at the following:
1. Who taught Cain how to plot an assassination?
2. Who or what gave him the courage to kill Abel?
3. Was Abel truly his biological brother – if so from where did he conceive the wickedness of heart to hurt his only sibling?
4. Did someone else tutor Cain? Definitely Adam could not have done so! -- So who did??.
5. Note, why did God even reprimand him in verse 6, and warn him in verse 7,ever before he took the action?
v.6. “Then the Lord said to Cain, “why are you angry? Why that scowl on your face?
v.7 If you had done the right thing, you would be smiling, but because you have done evil, sin is crouching at your door, it wants to rule you, but you must overcome it.”
Who could have been so clearly warned and yet go ahead to commit a novel crime – that no one else had ever thought of – no, not even brothers and sisters during the time of Sodom and Gomorrah?
Jideofo: Now, I can see clearly – what you are implying
Jude: Na so – always seeing – now translate, if you can see clearly.
Jideofo: Are you blind? If Cain respected God as the Almighty Creator and his grandfather – he would have listened to his warning and taken the advice to overcome the sin that was crouching at his door.
Jude: Good – and so – what next?
Jideofo: He behaved like his progenitor – the snake that disvirgined Eve – yeah – yes – Cain must have been the result of Satan impregnating Eve first.
Kenez: Yeah, I knew, both of you would crack the nut – simple – moreover remember Adam was a novice – and even if he did learn anything – his gonads were immature at that point in time and he know nothing about ovulation dates, menses and menstruation cycles?
Jude: Hey, Kenez – super blasphemy – my ear drums will soon burst – stop it, heretic?
Jideofo: Who is a heretic? You are the one – you heard God warn Cain and he refused to listen – Now, you his descendant have refused to listen to Kenez – give a good interpretation of the origin of murder as the second sin of the bible!
Jude: I am sorry – after Adam’s fall – sin took over control of human beings and Cain was the first human being reportedly born to Adam and Eve as a result of carnal knowledge – see Genesis 4 – verses 1 and 2, especially in the KJV – whose rendition is crystal clear!
v.1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and have Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
v.2 And she again leave his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but was a tiller of the ground.
Kenez: Who said, ”I have gotten a man from the Lord!”
Jideofo: Eve, of course!
Jude No!, it was Adam..
Kenez: Jude, so you are so daft that you can be looking at deceit and forgery and not recognize either?? That narrative stated in black and white, whether it was Eve or Adam “I have gotten a man from the Lord” not from his loins. To clarify this issue – revisit the quotation I gave you the other day – Genesis 5, verse 3, specifically:
KJV – Genesis 5 verse 3.
v. 3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called him Seth.
Are you still blindfolded by theological deceits and theories? Why did the narrative emphasize the following:
1. Adam waited for one hundred and thirty years.
2. Why was the verb “begat” used as different from “knew Eve, his wife; and she conceived, and bore Cain”?
3. Nothing can prove it better than – the double emphasis in verse 3 – “and begat” a son in his own likeness” and “after his image.”
4. “Called” and “named” are dissimilar – especially when reasons for the names are added immediately:
Read that verse again:
“v.5 and she bore Cain and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.” --KJV.
Notice the reason for the name as stated by either Eve or Adam; not the addendum by theoretical theologians! “I Have Gotten A Man By The Lord.” - that “from” was inserted by deceitful writers or forgers!!
Now compare that translation with GNB version;.
Gen. 4, verse1: “Then Adam had intercourse with his wife, and she become pregnant. She bore a son and said; “By the Lord’s help, I have acquired a son.” Yet another clearer verb denoting “assistance”
RSV – says; almost the same thing but let’s see its own translation…...
“Gen. 4 – verse 1: Now Adam knew Eve, his wife and she conceived and bore a son, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord”, Jude and Jideofo, my dear ones, – can’t you see “ a man gotten with the help of the Lord” – is different from the narrative in Chapter 5; entitled ”The Descendants of Adam.” The earliest writers were not unaware of Cain and Abel before they went ahead to expunge the two names from the true descendants of Adam. Moreover – Adam waited” an hundred and thirty years” to mature properly before he was credited with having a son, naturally – from his own gonads “ “in his own likeness” and as if that was not enough – it is doubly emphasized; “after his image”. Developmental psychology today confirms that the growth hormone estrogen ensures that females mature earlier than males that are controlled by the androgen hormone! Read scientific books, my man, not only the fables in the bible!!
Jude: My colleagues – this is too much for me – I need a recess – another fifteen minutes to see clearly. Where am I, what have I gotten myself into? – Arguing with demonic demagogues and geniuses.
Jideofo: You are the demon here – since you see the clearly printed “WORD OF GOD” – and refuse to comprehend it by yourself – because you have been fed with manure from childhood … tied to the apron strings of Reverend Pastors and half-baked preachers!!
Kenez; Will someone, please read from the New International Version…NIV : please–
Jideofo: (reading ) Chapter 4, verse 1:”Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man.” Chee eh!! Now over to you, Jude, Who is LORD? in this passage…. The lover, of course, ”It’s Lucifer! the most handsome of the angels! The seducer, the tempter, the examiner, the rapist!!!
Kenez: The issue here is;
1. If Cain and Abel were biological sons of Adam and Eve – why were their names eliminated in Chapter 5, and in The Gospel of Luke; Chapter 3, verses 21 – 37? When you get home today, compare them!
2. Finally, read 1st Chronicles, Chapter 1 verse1, and you will not be left in any doubt that both Cain and Abel were not sons of Adam, though Eve gave birth to them!!!
3. If Cain and Abel were of same parents – could Cain ever have imagined killing Abel, his only sibling, junior brother?
For clarification read John Chapter 8, verses 43 – 47 and you will balance the equation.
3.
4. If Cain was Adam’s biological son, from whom did he get the genetic code for assassination?
Sorry – there were no genetical screening in those days when these happened. If it were today both Cain and Abel could have benefited from medical science and truly known who their biological fathers were. Sure they were Eve’s sons – but there is not a single thread of evidence to authenticate that they were Adam’s sons. Even today – a pregnant woman can get married and later have intercourse with the official or legal husband and still bear a child resulting from an illicit love affair prior to the wedding ceremonies. Even in the bible – there were cases like that;
“That of the virgin mother!” Moreover, if Uriah had been alive – would David’s child not have answered Uriah’s name – whereas only Bathsheba would have known the true father of her child. Even at that, the child died – and to date, no one has told us how, where and when Absalom came into the picture. Check 2 Samuel, chapters 11 and 12; and tell us why, after Bathsheba bore Solomon, David named him – but v.25 “The Lord loved the boy and commanded the prophet Nathan to name the boy Jedidah”… (the 8th son of David).
Jideofo: True my friend, but remember, Jude has appealed for a recess – let us grant him that request – whenever he has sorted himself out – we shall continue.
Jude: Am I sure of my own first child today? – may be I need to go to a teaching hospital to ascertain the paternity of all my children – chei – na waooh! how?
Jideofo: Things that women and gods do – na wah? They sleep with angels – and yet claim that they are our wives. No one is ever sure these days – which children are biologically his, If you doubt me – read Genesis chapter 6 – verses 1 – to – 8 – which Kenez referred us to earlier.
Kenez: All I am saying is that we must put on our thinking caps! I have not stated that Adam is not the father of Cain. The wonder is –No bible translator gave us details of any sexual intercourse in well documented and the miraculous births of:
1. ISSAC,the son of Abraham and Sarah,Gen:18,vv 9-15 & Gen: 21, vv 1-8.
2. SAMSON, the son of Manoah and Zorah, Judges: 13, read all the verses !
3. JOHN the Baptist, the son of Zechariah and Elizabeth, Luke: 1, vv 5 -25 & vv 57 – 66. Note, that only Zorah behaved wisely.
The Virgin Mother of Jesus should have copied Zorah’s example and saved us the guesswork on who truly was the biological father of Jesus, the Christ!! Despite this transgression to buttress my assertion, do mothers in your culture have the right to name the babies born in a family? Even if in the cases of some Jewish figures in the bible it was so, why then does the same bible record with emphasis; ”Adam named his son ; Seth? And even it is permissible, from whose genetic code did Cain inherit the ability to plot and assassinate his own blood brother ???
Jude: So what you are saying is similar to the statement “BY THEIR FRUITS, YOU SHALL KNOW THEM!” Mathew Chapter 12 , verse 33?
Jideofo: Wrong again – see Matt 7, verse 17 – that is the one appropriate for this discourse – read on till verse 20 where your quotation is lifted from, confused Christian!
Jude: How inconsistent you can be, Jideofo – so you know so much of the Bible, yet you pretend to be a heathen philosopher!
Kenez: Both of you are quarrelling over statements alluding to Cain’s parentage – but John, the Apostle in his first letter states it affirmatively.
1 John chapter 3, verse 12.
v.12 We must not be like Cain, he belonged to the Evil one, and murdered his own brother Abel! Why did Cain murder him? Because the things he himself did were wrong, but the things his brother did were right. ”Now the final nail on the coffin
Read LUKE 3 , vv 21 – 37 and you will see the correspondence between O.T. & the N.T. Cain and Abel were omitted in the genealogy of Jesus!, whereas Adam was specifically named “the son of God.” Why? Again, Matthew had a genealogy that stopped at Abraham, Luke traced it further to Adam, and notice that Cain was again clearly omitted. These are not errors of omission but statements of the facts!! Can anyone tell us why an overzealous translator or dogmatist decided to deceive the whole human race with the falsehood that Cain was a biological son of Adam, by inserting “sexual intercourse” in the narrative? Where else, in the whole bible did such a deceptive insertion occur??? If anyone knows, tell us!!!
Jideofo: Only God can save our generation then, if even at the beginning of creation, illegitimate sons had already started committing coup d’etats” – who can state “whose son”, his first child may be – until a paternity test is carried out … No one, ask Adam, Uriah or Joseph, the carpenter.
Kenez: Let’s disperse, jooh! You are both missing the point I’m raising. Abel had a different super-biological father from the super-biological father of Cain – hence the differences in character, occupation and respect for their Grandfather GOD! not Adam!!! This was clearly demonstrated and tested by the sacrifices with their first fruits of their professions at harvest time!! Cain’s true father is the destroyer, a killer, and a liar right from the beginning. Please go and read the gospel of John; Chapter 8,and you will see where Jesus exposed it all!! And may be to resolve that, another ‘holy’ angel had to counter that with fathering or bearing Abel. But quickly Cain’s father advised his own evil son to eliminate Abel and so populate the world with only his own evil genes, and to dates he still does!!! So to date we have evil children right from their birth of whom, King Solomon said were “crooked” and “no one can straighten out what God has made crooked”. See the Book of Proverbs for more.
My thesis therefore is; there are two species of mankind; the free ones -sons of Adam through Seth and the slaves -sons of Satan through Cain. Jesus, the Christ told us so in plain language. The grandchildren and descendants of the Snake are detailed in Genesis Chapter 4, verses 17-24, Enoch, Irad, Mehujael, Methushael, Lamech, the first polygamist, then Jabal, Tubal Cain.
The full book has A-4 size 560 pages and 37 references in three volumes.
Penned as far back 1979 but lately and hesitantly printed in 2001.
I had lived in fear and trepidation of fanatics and mystics like you asking for my head!
No!! I am more circumspect that John, the Baptist and
The Children of the EVIL one like you can never decapitate me
To get details, send you emails to: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk or agunabu1948@gmail.com
A CONTINUATION OF “CAIN’S PATERNITY IN DISPUTE”.
Jude: Sorry my colleagues – I was dumbfounded during our last discourse and I treaded softly – in order to avoid errors and behold – that in itself – was the greatest error.
Jideofo: Enough – we are here – let’s go straight to business. Kindly remind us where stopped, you Christian fanatic.
Jude: Kenez gave us some quotations to read and digest – and the most meaningful to me is – Genesis 5 – I read it through three times and I asked – was Seth the first son of Adam?
Kenez: Now you are coming home! – Did you note the CAPTION – is there any title given to Chapter 5?
Jideofo: Whatever brought in the concept into Kenez mind, I can’t decode – Hey you, Kenez – from where and since when did you start doubting the paternity of Cain?
Kenez: Good – have you even read Genesis, Chapter 4 verse 8 critically in GNB version?
“Then Cain said to his brother Abel, “let’s go out in the fields. When they were out in the fields, Cain turned on his brother and killed him.” You need to sit down and think deep before you arrive at the following:
1. Who taught Cain how to plot an assassination?
2. Who or what gave him the courage to kill Abel?
3. Was Abel truly his biological brother – if so from where did he conceive the wickedness of heart to hurt his only sibling?
4. Did someone else tutor Cain? Definitely Adam could not have done so! -- So who did??.
5. Note, why did God even reprimand him in verse 6, and warn him in verse 7,ever before he took the action?
v.6. “Then the Lord said to Cain, “why are you angry? Why that scowl on your face?
v.7 If you had done the right thing, you would be smiling, but because you have done evil, sin is crouching at your door, it wants to rule you, but you must overcome it.”
Who could have been so clearly warned and yet go ahead to commit a novel crime – that no one else had ever thought of – no, not even brothers and sisters during the time of Sodom and Gomorrah?
Jideofo: Now, I can see clearly – what you are implying
Jude: Na so – always seeing – now translate, if you can see clearly.
Jideofo: Are you blind? If Cain respected God as the Almighty Creator and his grandfather – he would have listened to his warning and taken the advice to overcome the sin that was crouching at his door.
Jude: Good – and so – what next?
Jideofo: He behaved like his progenitor – the snake that disvirgined Eve – yeah – yes – Cain must have been the result of Satan impregnating Eve first.
Kenez: Yeah, I knew, both of you would crack the nut – simple – moreover remember Adam was a novice – and even if he did learn anything – his gonads were immature at that point in time and he know nothing about ovulation dates, menses and menstruation cycles?
Jude: Hey, Kenez – super blasphemy – my ear drums will soon burst – stop it, heretic?
Jideofo: Who is a heretic? You are the one – you heard God warn Cain and he refused to listen – Now, you his descendant have refused to listen to Kenez – give a good interpretation of the origin of murder as the second sin of the bible!
Jude: I am sorry – after Adam’s fall – sin took over control of human beings and Cain was the first human being reportedly born to Adam and Eve as a result of carnal knowledge – see Genesis 4 – verses 1 and 2, especially in the KJV – whose rendition is crystal clear!
v.1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and have Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
v.2 And she again leave his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but was a tiller of the ground.
Kenez: Who said, ”I have gotten a man from the Lord!”
Jideofo: Eve, of course!
Jude No!, it was Adam..
Kenez: Jude, so you are so daft that you can be looking at deceit and forgery and not recognize either?? That narrative stated in black and white, whether it was Eve or Adam “I have gotten a man from the Lord” not from his loins. To clarify this issue – revisit the quotation I gave you the other day – Genesis 5, verse 3, specifically:
KJV – Genesis 5 verse 3.
v. 3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called him Seth.
Are you still blindfolded by theological deceits and theories? Why did the narrative emphasize the following:
1. Adam waited for one hundred and thirty years.
2. Why was the verb “begat” used as different from “knew Eve, his wife; and she conceived, and bore Cain”?
3. Nothing can prove it better than – the double emphasis in verse 3 – “and begat” a son in his own likeness” and “after his image.”
4. “Called” and “named” are dissimilar – especially when reasons for the names are added immediately:
Read that verse again:
“v.5 and she bore Cain and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.” --KJV.
Notice the reason for the name as stated by either Eve or Adam; not the addendum by theoretical theologians! “I Have Gotten A Man By The Lord.” - that “from” was inserted by deceitful writers or forgers!!
Now compare that translation with GNB version;.
Gen. 4, verse1: “Then Adam had intercourse with his wife, and she become pregnant. She bore a son and said; “By the Lord’s help, I have acquired a son.” Yet another clearer verb denoting “assistance”
RSV – says; almost the same thing but let’s see its own translation…...
“Gen. 4 – verse 1: Now Adam knew Eve, his wife and she conceived and bore a son, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord”, Jude and Jideofo, my dear ones, – can’t you see “ a man gotten with the help of the Lord” – is different from the narrative in Chapter 5; entitled ”The Descendants of Adam.” The earliest writers were not unaware of Cain and Abel before they went ahead to expunge the two names from the true descendants of Adam. Moreover – Adam waited” an hundred and thirty years” to mature properly before he was credited with having a son, naturally – from his own gonads “ “in his own likeness” and as if that was not enough – it is doubly emphasized; “after his image”. Developmental psychology today confirms that the growth hormone estrogen ensures that females mature earlier than males that are controlled by the androgen hormone! Read scientific books, my man, not only the fables in the bible!!
Jude: My colleagues – this is too much for me – I need a recess – another fifteen minutes to see clearly. Where am I, what have I gotten myself into? – Arguing with demonic demagogues and geniuses.
Jideofo: You are the demon here – since you see the clearly printed “WORD OF GOD” – and refuse to comprehend it by yourself – because you have been fed with manure from childhood … tied to the apron strings of Reverend Pastors and half-baked preachers!!
Kenez; Will someone, please read from the New International Version…NIV : please–
Jideofo: (reading ) Chapter 4, verse 1:”Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man.” Chee eh!! Now over to you, Jude, Who is LORD? in this passage…. The lover, of course, ”It’s Lucifer! the most handsome of the angels! The seducer, the tempter, the examiner, the rapist!!!
Kenez: The issue here is;
1. If Cain and Abel were biological sons of Adam and Eve – why were their names eliminated in Chapter 5, and in The Gospel of Luke; Chapter 3, verses 21 – 37? When you get home today, compare them!
2. Finally, read 1st Chronicles, Chapter 1 verse1, and you will not be left in any doubt that both Cain and Abel were not sons of Adam, though Eve gave birth to them!!!
3. If Cain and Abel were of same parents – could Cain ever have imagined killing Abel, his only sibling, junior brother?
For clarification read John Chapter 8, verses 43 – 47 and you will balance the equation.
3.
4. If Cain was Adam’s biological son, from whom did he get the genetic code for assassination?
Sorry – there were no genetical screening in those days when these happened. If it were today both Cain and Abel could have benefited from medical science and truly known who their biological fathers were. Sure they were Eve’s sons – but there is not a single thread of evidence to authenticate that they were Adam’s sons. Even today – a pregnant woman can get married and later have intercourse with the official or legal husband and still bear a child resulting from an illicit love affair prior to the wedding ceremonies. Even in the bible – there were cases like that;
“That of the virgin mother!” Moreover, if Uriah had been alive – would David’s child not have answered Uriah’s name – whereas only Bathsheba would have known the true father of her child. Even at that, the child died – and to date, no one has told us how, where and when Absalom came into the picture. Check 2 Samuel, chapters 11 and 12; and tell us why, after Bathsheba bore Solomon, David named him – but v.25 “The Lord loved the boy and commanded the prophet Nathan to name the boy Jedidah”… (the 8th son of David).
Jideofo: True my friend, but remember, Jude has appealed for a recess – let us grant him that request – whenever he has sorted himself out – we shall continue.
Jude: Am I sure of my own first child today? – may be I need to go to a teaching hospital to ascertain the paternity of all my children – chei – na waooh! how?
Jideofo: Things that women and gods do – na wah? They sleep with angels – and yet claim that they are our wives. No one is ever sure these days – which children are biologically his, If you doubt me – read Genesis chapter 6 – verses 1 – to – 8 – which Kenez referred us to earlier.
Kenez: All I am saying is that we must put on our thinking caps! I have not stated that Adam is not the father of Cain. The wonder is –No bible translator gave us details of any sexual intercourse in well documented and the miraculous births of:
1. ISSAC,the son of Abraham and Sarah,Gen:18,vv 9-15 & Gen: 21, vv 1-8.
2. SAMSON, the son of Manoah and Zorah, Judges: 13, read all the verses !
3. JOHN the Baptist, the son of Zechariah and Elizabeth, Luke: 1, vv 5 -25 & vv 57 – 66. Note, that only Zorah behaved wisely.
The Virgin Mother of Jesus should have copied Zorah’s example and saved us the guesswork on who truly was the biological father of Jesus, the Christ!! Despite this transgression to buttress my assertion, do mothers in your culture have the right to name the babies born in a family? Even if in the cases of some Jewish figures in the bible it was so, why then does the same bible record with emphasis; ”Adam named his son ; Seth? And even it is permissible, from whose genetic code did Cain inherit the ability to plot and assassinate his own blood brother ???
Jude: So what you are saying is similar to the statement “BY THEIR FRUITS, YOU SHALL KNOW THEM!” Mathew Chapter 12 , verse 33?
Jideofo: Wrong again – see Matt 7, verse 17 – that is the one appropriate for this discourse – read on till verse 20 where your quotation is lifted from, confused Christian!
Jude: How inconsistent you can be, Jideofo – so you know so much of the Bible, yet you pretend to be a heathen philosopher!
Kenez: Both of you are quarrelling over statements alluding to Cain’s parentage – but John, the Apostle in his first letter states it affirmatively.
1 John chapter 3, verse 12.
v.12 We must not be like Cain, he belonged to the Evil one, and murdered his own brother Abel! Why did Cain murder him? Because the things he himself did were wrong, but the things his brother did were right. ”Now the final nail on the coffin
Read LUKE 3 , vv 21 – 37 and you will see the correspondence between O.T. & the N.T. Cain and Abel were omitted in the genealogy of Jesus!, whereas Adam was specifically named “the son of God.” Why? Again, Matthew had a genealogy that stopped at Abraham, Luke traced it further to Adam, and notice that Cain was again clearly omitted. These are not errors of omission but statements of the facts!! Can anyone tell us why an overzealous translator or dogmatist decided to deceive the whole human race with the falsehood that Cain was a biological son of Adam, by inserting “sexual intercourse” in the narrative? Where else, in the whole bible did such a deceptive insertion occur??? If anyone knows, tell us!!!
Jideofo: Only God can save our generation then, if even at the beginning of creation, illegitimate sons had already started committing coup d’etats” – who can state “whose son”, his first child may be – until a paternity test is carried out … No one, ask Adam, Uriah or Joseph, the carpenter.
Kenez: Let’s disperse, jooh! You are both missing the point I’m raising. Abel had a different super-biological father from the super-biological father of Cain – hence the differences in character, occupation and respect for their Grandfather GOD! not Adam!!! This was clearly demonstrated and tested by the sacrifices with their first fruits of their professions at harvest time!! Cain’s true father is the destroyer, a killer, and a liar right from the beginning. Please go and read the gospel of John; Chapter 8,and you will see where Jesus exposed it all!! And may be to resolve that, another ‘holy’ angel had to counter that with fathering or bearing Abel. But quickly Cain’s father advised his own evil son to eliminate Abel and so populate the world with only his own evil genes, and to dates he still does!!! So to date we have evil children right from their birth of whom, King Solomon said were “crooked” and “no one can straighten out what God has made crooked”. See the Book of Proverbs for more.
My thesis therefore is; there are two species of mankind; the free ones -sons of Adam through Seth and the slaves -sons of Satan through Cain. Jesus, the Christ told us so in plain language. The grandchildren and descendants of the Snake are detailed in Genesis Chapter 4, verses 17-24, Enoch, Irad, Mehujael, Methushael, Lamech, the first polygamist, then Jabal, Tubal Cain.
The full book has A-4 size 560 pages and 37 references in three volumes.
Penned as far back 1979 but lately and hesitantly printed in 2001.
I had lived in fear and trepidation of fanatics and mystics like you asking for my head!
No!! I am more circumspect that John, the Baptist and
The Children of the EVIL one like you can never decapitate me
To get details, send you emails to: saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk or agunabu1948@gmail.com
Expand this
comment »
THE ORIGINS OF ALL THE TREATIS ES
ON RELIGION DATES BACK TO SEMINARY YEARS AT ONITSHA ENUGU
At the Diamond Jubilee
celebrations of one of the minor seminaries in Onitsha Ecclesiastical Province,
history was made when all the ‘Old Boys’ of the institution conferred titles on
prominent members of their Alumni Association. This was one of the hilarious
highlights of the events lined up to entertain the octogenarian Cardinals and
Archbishops who came all that way from Rome, the capital of Roman Catholicism.
It was comical as some of the ‘famous & notorious boys’ during their schooling years as adolescents in the seminary were the butt of the jokes. To cut the long story short, some were ‘ordained’ “Rev. Fr. Echipus” meaning that ‘they were qualified candidates that never stayed long enough to get their papal ordinations, but have settled on being good husbands and exemplary ‘lay-priests’ in their various homes, families and communities!
This author was unanimously catapulted to the rank of “Rt. Rev Bishop Echipu”as objections were raised from the rostrum by his former students who were already bishops and one of them who protested was actually the newly installed Auxiliary Archbishop of the province! So, it was that he immediately shed his former teenage nickname of “Atom” and put on the new toga! The three bishops who ensured that their mentor/teacher got the deserved title topped the hilarious occasion by donating three bottles of champagne!
This event happened as far back as 1999 at All Hallows Seminary Onitsha that was founded in 1924. Unknown to most of the celebrants, the recipient was hurting inside. He had uncovered so many puerile dogmas and futile doctrines he considered born of pagan origins in Roman Mithraism! He had written down inspirations he got to call a press conference to expose the deceits. He was really going through the hardest trials of his Christian faith!
It was comical as some of the ‘famous & notorious boys’ during their schooling years as adolescents in the seminary were the butt of the jokes. To cut the long story short, some were ‘ordained’ “Rev. Fr. Echipus” meaning that ‘they were qualified candidates that never stayed long enough to get their papal ordinations, but have settled on being good husbands and exemplary ‘lay-priests’ in their various homes, families and communities!
This author was unanimously catapulted to the rank of “Rt. Rev Bishop Echipu”as objections were raised from the rostrum by his former students who were already bishops and one of them who protested was actually the newly installed Auxiliary Archbishop of the province! So, it was that he immediately shed his former teenage nickname of “Atom” and put on the new toga! The three bishops who ensured that their mentor/teacher got the deserved title topped the hilarious occasion by donating three bottles of champagne!
This event happened as far back as 1999 at All Hallows Seminary Onitsha that was founded in 1924. Unknown to most of the celebrants, the recipient was hurting inside. He had uncovered so many puerile dogmas and futile doctrines he considered born of pagan origins in Roman Mithraism! He had written down inspirations he got to call a press conference to expose the deceits. He was really going through the hardest trials of his Christian faith!
He was confused;
should he publicly recant and risk being labelled an apostate or hide his head
as an ostrich does in the sand forgetting that the massive body was still
exposed to public glare? Or, in the alternative, should he continue to suffer
under the canopy of being an exemplary ex-seminarian; the few good ones that
pretended all was well with their once religious traditions and acquiesced to
the imperial authority of Rome
This dissertation answers the last ambiguity in a way that leaves no one in doubt as to where the Rt. Rev. Bishop is heading now. Enjoy his anxieties!
Chapter 1:
JESUS NEVER ENTHRONED HIMSELF AS GOD
Only the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews captured the personality traits of Jesus conferred on him by the Almighty Father! In this opening chapter unlike every other book in the entire Bible, the narrative confirms my thesis that Jesus was/is the Son of God, elevated above every other created beings but never equal to the Supreme Being that created him and us! We do not show respect to the Father by equating him to his created, nor do we favour Jesus by setting him up against his Father.
Meditate on the bold phrases in this excerpt and really think them over. Can an ambassador be equal to the President of his home country? Can one who was granted special powers ever be equal to the One who gave him the powers in the first place? The answer is definitely; NO!
This passage states the statuses and special favours God, the Almighty Father of all of us bestowed on Jesus for a purpose! That is why he was able to stand all the temptations and triumph over the devil in every way even ‘death on the cross.’ My hope is that Christians should learn to worship only God the Father as Jesus enjoined us to and conscientiously respect him as the Son of God for accepting to die to save mankind!
Hebrews 1
1:1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.
3 The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.
4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.
5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, "I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him.”
7 In speaking of the angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire."
8 But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the sceptre of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy."
10 He also says, "In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment.
12 You will roll them up like a robe; like a garment they will be changed. But you remain the same, and your years will never end."
13 To which of the angels did God ever say, "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet"?
14 Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978 and 1984, by International Bible Society)
I have said it on several occasions that anyone who is very serious with authentic religion; obedience to the natural laws of the Almighty Father, and tenacious about true worship of Him with works of charity, mercy and forgiveness can aspire to Sainthood, just as Jesus did to earn Christhood! Jesus was not born the ‘Son of God’ but was adopted by the Almighty Father of us all at his baptism.
Tell me, was Jesus not a descendant from the family root of King David as prophesied in the OT? Even in the psalms credited to David, is the evidence not clear? He received a special gift of anointing by the ‘Holy Spirit that came down in the form of a dove and rested on him’, as was reported by John, the Baptist, his maternal cousin!
Matt 3:13-17
13 Then Jesus came fromGalilee to the Jordan
14 But John tried to deter him, saying, "I need to be baptised by you, and do you come to me?"
15 Jesus replied, "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfil all righteousness." Then John consented.
16 As soon as Jesus was baptised, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him.
17 And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1978, 1984, by International Bible Society)
This is the truth of the matter as is again clearly stated by Peter, the head of the apostles during his inaugural speech in defence of the charge of drunkenness levied at the apostles on the day of first ever Pentecost;
Acts 10:37&38
37 You know what has happened throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached—
38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with him.
So, ‘Emmanuel’ the name the angel gave before his conception was changed to ‘Christ’ at this baptism! This is still done to date in churches! So, what is the encyclopaedic definition of “Christ”; a Greek translation?
“CHRIST”, is a Greek term found in the Greek version of the Old Testament (see Bible), the Septuagint, translating the Hebrew verb “mâshakh”, meaning, “to anoint.” In earlyIsrael
This is my analysis of the contentious matter regarding the divinity ascribed to him in most Christian communities.
The word ‘Christ’ is a term that has historically been applied to kings, prophets and patriarchs in earlyIsrael
The truth therefore is that Jesus was born of Joseph and a virgin mother, Mary. He was later adopted by the Most High as his ‘Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased, listen to him’!
· This fact does not reduce his honour and position as the first-born. Rather it emphasises the fact that anyone that works hard by imitating him will also earn God’s adoption. If you have been assigned a divine ministry as Jesus was, then work hard at it and follow it through!
His predecessors who could have earned the title were not prudent, obedient nor tenacious and therefore failed by the way side due to human concupiscence. A few leaders, prophets and judges of the old dispensation like Patriarch Enoch (Gen 5), Joshua and Prophet Elijah (Kings 7) passed!
Moses failed because of his quick temper and doubtfully striking the rock twice erratically rather than once.
Samson did not heed the instructions about wine and women before his birth; rather he recklessly slept with prostitutes and later married against God’s instruction.
Saul disobeyed the Almighty who made him king as he thought that God preferred sacrifices rather obedience. He should have obeyed the instructions of the Almighty God to the letter.
David disappointed the Most High when he committed adultery and complicated it with a pre-meditated murder.
Solomon, the first to be adopted by the God of the Israelites was an ingrate. He was too romantic, had insatiable lust for sex, married foreign women and worshipped their gods and so openly violated God’s covenant with his father David.
This dissertation answers the last ambiguity in a way that leaves no one in doubt as to where the Rt. Rev. Bishop is heading now. Enjoy his anxieties!
Chapter 1:
JESUS NEVER ENTHRONED HIMSELF AS GOD
Only the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews captured the personality traits of Jesus conferred on him by the Almighty Father! In this opening chapter unlike every other book in the entire Bible, the narrative confirms my thesis that Jesus was/is the Son of God, elevated above every other created beings but never equal to the Supreme Being that created him and us! We do not show respect to the Father by equating him to his created, nor do we favour Jesus by setting him up against his Father.
Meditate on the bold phrases in this excerpt and really think them over. Can an ambassador be equal to the President of his home country? Can one who was granted special powers ever be equal to the One who gave him the powers in the first place? The answer is definitely; NO!
This passage states the statuses and special favours God, the Almighty Father of all of us bestowed on Jesus for a purpose! That is why he was able to stand all the temptations and triumph over the devil in every way even ‘death on the cross.’ My hope is that Christians should learn to worship only God the Father as Jesus enjoined us to and conscientiously respect him as the Son of God for accepting to die to save mankind!
Hebrews 1
1:1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.
3 The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.
4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.
5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, "I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, "Let all God's angels worship him.”
7 In speaking of the angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire."
8 But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the sceptre of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy."
10 He also says, "In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment.
12 You will roll them up like a robe; like a garment they will be changed. But you remain the same, and your years will never end."
13 To which of the angels did God ever say, "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet"?
14 Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978 and 1984, by International Bible Society)
I have said it on several occasions that anyone who is very serious with authentic religion; obedience to the natural laws of the Almighty Father, and tenacious about true worship of Him with works of charity, mercy and forgiveness can aspire to Sainthood, just as Jesus did to earn Christhood! Jesus was not born the ‘Son of God’ but was adopted by the Almighty Father of us all at his baptism.
Tell me, was Jesus not a descendant from the family root of King David as prophesied in the OT? Even in the psalms credited to David, is the evidence not clear? He received a special gift of anointing by the ‘Holy Spirit that came down in the form of a dove and rested on him’, as was reported by John, the Baptist, his maternal cousin!
Matt 3:13-17
13 Then Jesus came from
14 But John tried to deter him, saying, "I need to be baptised by you, and do you come to me?"
15 Jesus replied, "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfil all righteousness." Then John consented.
16 As soon as Jesus was baptised, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him.
17 And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."
(From the Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1978, 1984, by International Bible Society)
This is the truth of the matter as is again clearly stated by Peter, the head of the apostles during his inaugural speech in defence of the charge of drunkenness levied at the apostles on the day of first ever Pentecost;
Acts 10:37&38
37 You know what has happened throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached—
38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with him.
So, ‘Emmanuel’ the name the angel gave before his conception was changed to ‘Christ’ at this baptism! This is still done to date in churches! So, what is the encyclopaedic definition of “Christ”; a Greek translation?
“CHRIST”, is a Greek term found in the Greek version of the Old Testament (see Bible), the Septuagint, translating the Hebrew verb “mâshakh”, meaning, “to anoint.” In early
This is my analysis of the contentious matter regarding the divinity ascribed to him in most Christian communities.
The word ‘Christ’ is a term that has historically been applied to kings, prophets and patriarchs in early
The truth therefore is that Jesus was born of Joseph and a virgin mother, Mary. He was later adopted by the Most High as his ‘Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased, listen to him’!
· This fact does not reduce his honour and position as the first-born. Rather it emphasises the fact that anyone that works hard by imitating him will also earn God’s adoption. If you have been assigned a divine ministry as Jesus was, then work hard at it and follow it through!
His predecessors who could have earned the title were not prudent, obedient nor tenacious and therefore failed by the way side due to human concupiscence. A few leaders, prophets and judges of the old dispensation like Patriarch Enoch (Gen 5), Joshua and Prophet Elijah (Kings 7) passed!
Moses failed because of his quick temper and doubtfully striking the rock twice erratically rather than once.
Samson did not heed the instructions about wine and women before his birth; rather he recklessly slept with prostitutes and later married against God’s instruction.
Saul disobeyed the Almighty who made him king as he thought that God preferred sacrifices rather obedience. He should have obeyed the instructions of the Almighty God to the letter.
David disappointed the Most High when he committed adultery and complicated it with a pre-meditated murder.
Solomon, the first to be adopted by the God of the Israelites was an ingrate. He was too romantic, had insatiable lust for sex, married foreign women and worshipped their gods and so openly violated God’s covenant with his father David.
I will supply a more
detailed list of references to this list later;
Judges 13
13:1 Again the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the LORD, so the LORD delivered them into the hands of the Philistines for forty years.
2 A certain man of Zorah, named Manoah, from the clan of the Danites, had a wife who was sterile and remained childless.
3 The angel of the LORD appeared to her and said, "You are sterile and childless, but you are going to conceive and have a son.
4 Now see to it that you drink no wine or other fermented drink and that you do not eat anything unclean,
5 because you will conceive and give birth to a son. No razor may be used on his head, because the boy is to be a Nazirite, set apart to God from birth, and he will begin the deliverance ofIsrael
6 Then the woman went to her husband and told him, "A man of God came to me. He looked like an angel of God, very awesome. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.
7 But he said to me, 'You will conceive and give birth to a son. Now then, drink no wine or other fermented drink and do not eat anything unclean, because the boy will be a Nazirite of God from birth until the day of his death.'"
8 Then Manoah prayed to the LORD: "O Lord, I beg you, let the man of God you sent to us come again to teach us how to bring up the boy who is to be born."
9 God heard Manoah, and the angel of God came again to the woman while she was out in the field; but her husband Manoah was not with her.
10 The woman hurried to tell her husband, "He's here! The man who appeared to me the other day!"
11 Manoah got up and followed his wife. When he came to the man, he said, "Are you the one who talked to my wife?" "I am," he said.
12 So Manoah asked him, "When your words are fulfilled, what is to be the rule for the boy's life and work?"
13 The angel of the LORD answered, "Your wife must do all that I have told her.
14 She must not eat anything that comes from the grapevine, nor drink any wine or other fermented drink nor eat anything unclean. She must do everything I have commanded her."
15 Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, "We would like you to stay until we prepare a young goat for you."
16 The angel of the LORD replied, "Even though you detain me, I will not eat any of your food. But if you prepare a burnt offering, offer it to the LORD." (Manoah did not realise that it was the angel of the LORD.)
17 Then Manoah enquired of the angel of the LORD, "What is your name, so that we may honour you when your word comes true?"
18 He replied, "Why do you ask my name? It is beyond understanding."
19 Then Manoah took a young goat, together with the grain offering, and sacrificed it on a rock to the LORD. And the LORD did an amazing thing while Manoah and his wife watched:
20 As the flame blazed up from the altar towards heaven, the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame. Seeing this, Manoah and his wife fell with their faces to the ground.
21 When the angel of the LORD did not show himself again to Manoah and his wife, Manoah realised that it was the angel of the LORD.
22 "We are doomed to die!" he said to his wife. "We have seen God!"
23 But his wife answered, "If the LORD had meant to kill us, he would not have accepted a burnt offering and grain offering from our hands, nor shown us all these things or now told us this."
24 The woman gave birth to a boy and named him Samson. He grew and the LORD blessed him,
25 and the Spirit of the LORD began to stir him while he was in Mahaneh Dan, between Zorah and Eshtaol.
(from The Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978, 1984, by International Bible Society)
If only Samson had listened and obeyed his parents, could he not have been renowned as a Saviour of his nation? He failed! For now, let us get a biblical support for my assertion that every believer qualifies for the title; ‘Christ’ right from birth! You can attain the level of sanctity for becoming adopted. In other words, we are all equipped to earn ‘Christhood’! Turn to;
Hebrews 5
Judges 13
13:1 Again the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the LORD, so the LORD delivered them into the hands of the Philistines for forty years.
2 A certain man of Zorah, named Manoah, from the clan of the Danites, had a wife who was sterile and remained childless.
3 The angel of the LORD appeared to her and said, "You are sterile and childless, but you are going to conceive and have a son.
4 Now see to it that you drink no wine or other fermented drink and that you do not eat anything unclean,
5 because you will conceive and give birth to a son. No razor may be used on his head, because the boy is to be a Nazirite, set apart to God from birth, and he will begin the deliverance of
6 Then the woman went to her husband and told him, "A man of God came to me. He looked like an angel of God, very awesome. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.
7 But he said to me, 'You will conceive and give birth to a son. Now then, drink no wine or other fermented drink and do not eat anything unclean, because the boy will be a Nazirite of God from birth until the day of his death.'"
8 Then Manoah prayed to the LORD: "O Lord, I beg you, let the man of God you sent to us come again to teach us how to bring up the boy who is to be born."
9 God heard Manoah, and the angel of God came again to the woman while she was out in the field; but her husband Manoah was not with her.
10 The woman hurried to tell her husband, "He's here! The man who appeared to me the other day!"
11 Manoah got up and followed his wife. When he came to the man, he said, "Are you the one who talked to my wife?" "I am," he said.
12 So Manoah asked him, "When your words are fulfilled, what is to be the rule for the boy's life and work?"
13 The angel of the LORD answered, "Your wife must do all that I have told her.
14 She must not eat anything that comes from the grapevine, nor drink any wine or other fermented drink nor eat anything unclean. She must do everything I have commanded her."
15 Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, "We would like you to stay until we prepare a young goat for you."
16 The angel of the LORD replied, "Even though you detain me, I will not eat any of your food. But if you prepare a burnt offering, offer it to the LORD." (Manoah did not realise that it was the angel of the LORD.)
17 Then Manoah enquired of the angel of the LORD, "What is your name, so that we may honour you when your word comes true?"
18 He replied, "Why do you ask my name? It is beyond understanding."
19 Then Manoah took a young goat, together with the grain offering, and sacrificed it on a rock to the LORD. And the LORD did an amazing thing while Manoah and his wife watched:
20 As the flame blazed up from the altar towards heaven, the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame. Seeing this, Manoah and his wife fell with their faces to the ground.
21 When the angel of the LORD did not show himself again to Manoah and his wife, Manoah realised that it was the angel of the LORD.
22 "We are doomed to die!" he said to his wife. "We have seen God!"
23 But his wife answered, "If the LORD had meant to kill us, he would not have accepted a burnt offering and grain offering from our hands, nor shown us all these things or now told us this."
24 The woman gave birth to a boy and named him Samson. He grew and the LORD blessed him,
25 and the Spirit of the LORD began to stir him while he was in Mahaneh Dan, between Zorah and Eshtaol.
(from The Holy Bible: New International Version. Copyright (c) 1973, 1978, 1984, by International Bible Society)
If only Samson had listened and obeyed his parents, could he not have been renowned as a Saviour of his nation? He failed! For now, let us get a biblical support for my assertion that every believer qualifies for the title; ‘Christ’ right from birth! You can attain the level of sanctity for becoming adopted. In other words, we are all equipped to earn ‘Christhood’! Turn to;
Hebrews 5
5:1 Every high priest is selected from among men and is appointed to represent them in matters related to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins.
2 He is able to deal gently with those who are ignorant and are going astray, since he himself is subject to weakness.
3 This is why he has to offer sacrifices for his own sins, as well as for the sins of the people.
4 No one takes this honour upon himself; he must be called by God, just as Aaron was.
5 So Christ also did not take upon himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him,
"You are my Son; today I have become your Father."
6 And he says in another place,
"You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek."
7 During the days of Jesus' life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.
8 Although he was a son, he learned obedience from what he suffered
9 and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him
10 and was designated by God to be high priest in the order of Melchizedek.
11 We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn.
12 In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God's word all over again. You need milk, not solid food!
13 Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.
14 But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
If that long explanation does not satisfy your fanatical position, then follow it up with the very next chapter! If you do believe that ‘the whole scripture is the word of God’ and is for our edification, then believe what you read;
Hebrews 6
6:1 Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God,
2 instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.
3 And God permitting, we will do so.
4 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit,
5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age,
6 if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.
7 Land that drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God.
8 But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned.
9 Even though we speak like this, dear friends, we are confident of better things in your case-things that accompany salvation.
10 God is not unjust; he will not forget your work and the love you have shown him as you have helped his people and continue to help them.
11 We want each of you to show this same diligence to the very end, in order to make your hope sure.
12 We do not want you to become lazy, but to imitate those who through faith and patience inherit what has been promised.
13 When God made his promise to Abraham, since there was no one greater for him to swear by, he swore by himself,
14 saying, "I will surely bless you and give you many descendants”.
15 And so after waiting patiently, Abraham received what was promised.
16 Men swear by someone greater than themselves, and the oath confirms what is said and puts an end to all argument.
17 Because God wanted to make the unchanging nature of his purpose very clear to the heirs of what was promised, he confirmed it with an oath.
18 God did this so that, by two unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled to take hold of the hope offered to us may be greatly encouraged.
19 We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain,
20 where Jesus, who went before us, has entered on our behalf. He has become a high priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.
It is reported that Solomon was also adopted by the Most High. Go back and read all about his choice by the Almighty as the one to build him a temple. Many other prophets of old had performed miracles that equalled those of Jesus yet they did not earn the title, the Messiah or ‘Christ’; so it is left for us to decipher what made Jesus so exceptional that he was the only one fit to be adopted by the Father as; ‘This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased, hear you him’. Revisit the miracles of Elijah or Elisha; .... extras... 24 more pages............Q E D
I A
HE PROMI SED
TO FIND OUT AND ANSWER ME LATER! He never did and the Nigeria-Biafra war
ensured he left our shores without seeing me again. MY INQUIS ITIVE MIND SUBMERGED IT INTO THE SUBCONSCIOUS.
However in 1992 while on a long journey of 700 kilometres
from Maiduguri Onitsha COMM UNICATION
or being labelled AN APOSTATE. I kept pondering on it till I left the seminary,
read till I had a total of three Ph.D.s before I found the courage to pen and
post them for idiots like you to read.
AND NOW SEE
THE INGR ATITUDE FROM AN EMPTY
VESSEL LIKE YOU. I AM STILL SEARCHING.
Expand this
comment »
Add a comment... (Public)
Michael Sherlock shared this post with you. Mute notifications
from Michael Sherlock. To change what emails Google+ sends to you, you can
always manage email subscriptions on the settings page.
ALL THE COMM ENTS OF MICHAEL HOLMES REGARDING THE
DISSERTATIONS I POSTED TO HIM
Inbox
|
x
|
Michael
Sherlock (Google+)
|
Aug 23 (3 days ago)
 |
||
|
|||
|
Aug 24 (2 days ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
 |
I have no idea what you
are saying!
Reply to this email to
comment publicly on Google+. Or view post »
|
|||
New! Reply
to this email to comment. Michael Sherlock commented on your post. Mute updates to this post. Changewhat email
Google+ sends you.
Privacy tip: protect your info. Remove your email signature before you reply. |
 |
|
Aug 25 (1 day ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
|
I have written a book
called, 'I Am Christ:The Crucifixion-Painful Truths. Also, I
have a forum called, 'I Am Christ Forum,' here is the link if you are
interested: http://iamchristforum.com/christ/content.php
KInd regards. Michael Sherlock
Reply to this email to
comment publicly on Google+. Or view post »
|
|||
New! Reply
to this email to comment. Michael Sherlock commented on your post. Mute updates to this post. Changewhat email
Google+ sends you.
Privacy tip: protect your info. Remove your email signature before you reply. |
 |
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
Can you find any
evidence that the town of
Reply to this email to
comment publicly on Google+. Or view post »
|
|||
New! Reply
to this email to comment. Michael Sherlock commented on your post. Mute updates to this post. Changewhat email
Google+ sends you.
Privacy tip: protect your info. Remove your email signature before you reply. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
There is no evidence
for your assertion.
-- You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. MANLY P. HALL |
|||
 |
Click
here to Reply or Forward
|
ALL THE REPLIES
I SENT TO MICHAEL SHERLOCK ASSEMBLED TOGETHER FOR EASE OF COMPREHENSION OF MY
READERS
- Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu
Aug 24, 2012Edit
You are a religious pygmy, an intellectual deceit! MICHAEL
SHERLOCK; How can you just write “This is belief, not truth. Who wrote
"John" and when?" May be you are the great grand son of Sherlock
Holmes who was used to depict so many detective stories and never have grown
out of fantasies and fables. WHO WROTE John IS A CONTR OVERSI AL ISSUE but as long as you fanatics of
Christendom still use it, you cannot excise my quotations from thereof. You Are
A Deceit. Read John 8, verses 31 - 47 and see that you are a great grandson of
the Snake through Cain the first murderer.
- Danmbaezue Jideofo KenechukwuAug 24, 2012Edit
Don't ever make comments on what you are an illiterate!
You are not qualified to discuss RELIGION.
- Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu
Yesterday
You have to go back and start all over. Is it not divinely
providential that the Holy Spirit permitted you to see what he dictated to me
for over 35 years , which I reluctantly penned down so the scales on your eyes
will fall and you now can see clearly? Type in : Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu into the Goggle Search and be overwhelmed with more than
20 more inspired dissertations downloaded from above for humanity to end the
UNIVERSAL IDOLATRY started in Rome by a Pagan Emperor. MAY THE CREATOR BESTOW
ON YOU JUST A TENT H OF THE WISDOM HE GAVE TO THE YOUNG KING
SOLOMON WHO EARNESTLY PRAYED FOR KNOWLEDGE. Imitate Solomon and then wait for
as long as it pleases the Divine to grant your request. Remain Blessed in Jesus
Name!
- Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu
Dear Mike, I am not a historian. Names change over
centuries and so do maps. Forget it! That is infinitesimal compared to exposing
the forgeries in the Bible! Answer this: WHO WERE THE BIOLOGICAL FATHERS OF
CAIN & ABEL? Adam's First Son is emphatically stated in Genesis 5 with
double emphasis on In his own IMAG E
& In his LIKENESS? Falsifications by Pagan Theologians started right from
Genesis, My Dear. Send me answers in seven days, please! Remain A Student of
the Truth! WELCOME ON BOARD.
- Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu
Impulsiveness is a sure sign of NAIVETY, my dear and you
are definitely puerile in your spontaneity in exposing your illogical
and unwise misdemeanour!
See the cliché you posted just beside you infantile
vituperation! That says it all, YOU ARE THE ONE BEHAVING AS YOU HAVE FOUND ALL
THE TRUTH THERE IS TO FIND!
You were only asked to search for answers within seven
days and because you are a demented fanatic and 'I KNOW IT ALL MENTALITY'
You didn't even wait for an hour, ten hours, a day to
pass and already you have stupidly responded like you did before.
PLEASE DO NOTWRI TE ME AGAIN AS I
SEE YOU HAVE A PSYCHOPATHIC ETIOLOGY FOR YOUR MYOPIC VISION.
PLEASE DO NOT
"A fool at forty", the English say, "is a
fool forever"
STANDARD REPLY TO GOOGLE CIRCLE FRIENDS
ReplyDeleteHAPPY NEW YEAR 2013! YOU ARE WELCOME TO INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT; THE CRUSADERS FOR A LASTING GLOBAL PEACE.
Our mission is; “A global peace initiative for conscientiously seeking ways of healing the world of xenophobia and/or religious bigotry and our target is abrogating all forms of racial prejudices and halting current ethnic cleansings by denouncing religious fanaticism so we can enthrone a lasting global peace for our global village" Your wisdom in joining us will be better appreciated when you have gotten 100 members to become part of this Worldwide Peace Crusade. Your duty is to make our dissertations available to each new member and conduct weekly seminars where you all discuss the most efficient and effective ways of implementing our global objectives of having: ONE ALMIGHTY CREATOR, ONE CREATED UNIVERSE AND THEREFORE ONE HUMAN FAMILY. Send us their emails and passports for registration so we can come and inaugurate all of you as a community chapter. You will then be our Co-ordinator & Chairperson for that chapter.
My emails are;
agunabu1948@gmail.com & saintkenez@yahoo.co.uk
Website: www.happyfamilynetwork.hpae.com or for a closer look at what we stand for;
https://sites.google.com/site/integrationalspiritanmovement/home/mission-statement